Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scott Peterson's Father Breaks His Silence
KGO-TV ^ | May 6, 2005

Posted on 05/06/2005 11:10:03 AM PDT by Howlin

May 6 (ABC7) — Scott Peterson's father is breaking months of silence, lashing out at the Modesto Police Department and the media for his son's murder conviction. Local Headlines

'Finger' Lady On Her Way To San Jose Cinco de Mayo Celebration Gets Violent 72-Hour Ultimatum Issued For East Bay Hostage Scott Peterson's Father Breaks His Silence 12 Sex Predators Arrested In South Bay Castro Valley Double Shooting Suspect Wanted 2,000 S.F. Phone Customers Without Service Through Weekend 'Subway Bandit' Pleads Not Guilty In South Bay

More local news...

In a letter to the Modesto Bee, Lee Peterson says:

"My son was convicted because he had an affair. He was convicted by a jury full of hatred because of the way Scott was vilified in the media... Scott will be freed through the appellate process in time, mark my words."

Lee Peterson was responding to news reports last week that the Laci Peterson case cost taxpayers $4.1 million dollars.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: laci; murder; peterson; sanquentin; scum; sonsmurderer; wifesmurderer; willietheworm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-154 next last
To: anniegetyourgun

"No, Lee....your son was convicted of a double murder"

Exactly. Scott wasn't convicted for having an affair. He was convicted for murdering two humans because they became an inconvienence to his delusional playboy lifestyle.


61 posted on 05/06/2005 12:51:06 PM PDT by SunnySide (Ephes2:8 ByGraceYou'veBeenSavedThruFaithAGiftOfGodSoNoOneCanBoast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush
Consider: There was no cause of death, no crime scene, no motive, not a shred of evidence in the home or truck, no background of abuse, not even a harsh word was heard from Scott to Laci by any witness — including Sharon Rocha or Laci's siblings or friends.

I see, no motive. A sexual affair is a classic motive and the mere fact that he told the subject of the affair that his wife had recently died and he was single and available has nothing to do with what we call motive, hey.

This dope is clearly in denial.

62 posted on 05/06/2005 12:54:43 PM PDT by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

"The appellate process?"Did someone say Scott Peterson and "The appellate process?"

Mmmmm! Please say it again! Slowly! Oh yea! Oh yea! Yes! Yes! Yes!

(lighting cigarette)

That was good for me. How about you?

Greta.

63 posted on 05/06/2005 12:57:36 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (You must respect my a-tor-it-tah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stingy Dog
I hope his conviction will be reversed.

You are right about one thing.............."the enemy is us" if we can't see the difference between black and white. He is clearly as guilty as they come. You may need to clear your sinuses or something.

64 posted on 05/06/2005 12:58:50 PM PDT by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

Bwaaaa-haaa-haaa!


65 posted on 05/06/2005 1:02:15 PM PDT by SelmaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Howlin



Well, bless Lee's heart... he's still worshipping the "golden child."

Goes to show us all, exactly how Snott's parents enabled him all his life. Yes, their perfect Snott, is not a sociopathic double murderer, for crying out loud, he is the VICTIM!


66 posted on 05/06/2005 1:08:28 PM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Well, think about it, Howlin. If the Peterson's had an ounce of decency in their body, they'd have to ask, "What went wrong?" "Are we somehow responsible?" "Is there something we failed to do in raising our son to cause such behavior?"

And if they are honest enough to acknowledge some degree of blame, what then? How do they deal with that truth. How do they now deal with the publics opinion of them?

For the Peterson's, it would seem that it's easier to live in Make Believe Land rather than seek out truth.


67 posted on 05/06/2005 1:12:56 PM PDT by This Just In ((In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

:-)


68 posted on 05/06/2005 1:17:39 PM PDT by Howlin (North Carolina, where beer kegs are registered and illegal aliens run free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

Comment #69 Removed by Moderator

To: This Just In

I've felt all along that a normal parent would have "gotten" the truth out of her son one way or the other.

Maybe they just consciously rejected any thought that might have even led them to even be the least bit suspicious.

I keep thinking about Sirhan Sirhan; at one of his parole hearings, he said he had been reading up on Bobby Kennedy, and he felt like, if Kennedy were alive, he'd want him to be released from prison after all these years.

That night Jay Leno said, "Talk about back luck: the one guy who would defend him and he killed him."

Scott Peterson killed more than Laci and Conner that night. It may be years and years from now, but the Petersons will "get it" one day; I just hope we don't have to listen to them moan and groan until then. Just go away.


70 posted on 05/06/2005 1:24:51 PM PDT by Howlin (North Carolina, where beer kegs are registered and illegal aliens run free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
Since he has been convicted of double murder, your opinion would seem to assume a fact not in evidence.

Hold on. My assumptions are not invalid: your seeming conclusion is to blame the sins of the child upon the father. That conclusion is not necessarily a logical one.

The parents' contribution to his character may or may not have been a positive one--we can agree or disagree. Scott is responsible for his actions, I think we both agree fully.

We've all seen good parents have children that choose to be monsters.

I stand by my belief that the Peterson's need prayer.

71 posted on 05/06/2005 1:35:51 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

On balance, I think we agree more than we disagree.

I don't deal very well with people like Peterson's father who are in denial. It's a pernicious form of willful stupidity.


72 posted on 05/06/2005 1:38:43 PM PDT by Xenalyte (I am at Dr. Venture's lab to right that which is wrong and to repair the torn curtain of time itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Sorry, I missed your post earlier; you're just a better person than I am; they are a very hard family to pray for, unless you want to pray for them to do the right thing and encourage their son to do the right thing and admit what he has done and tell the Rocha family what happened to their daughter.


73 posted on 05/06/2005 1:39:22 PM PDT by Howlin (North Carolina, where beer kegs are registered and illegal aliens run free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"Maybe they just conciously rejected any thought that might have even led them to even be the least bit suspicious."

Selective reasoning, it would certainly seem. As I said, the parents would have to assume some of the blame if their boy committed the crimes, which I believe he did.

I should point out that I am not one who believes that all parents are to blame for their childrens criminal behavior. With the Peterson's case, judging by the families conduct, theirs is an exception.
74 posted on 05/06/2005 1:49:33 PM PDT by This Just In ((In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

If you read Crier's book, you'll be convinced you're right. As I said, toxic.


75 posted on 05/06/2005 1:52:20 PM PDT by Howlin (North Carolina, where beer kegs are registered and illegal aliens run free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Stingy Dog

Yeah your right, they guy goes on to his girlfriend about his wife's death and the fact that he is no a bachelor (and available) and the bodies turn up many miles from home where he said he was (and fishing although none of that fishing stuff added up to fishermen) and You believe his dad is right and he is innocent. cool........


76 posted on 05/06/2005 1:52:26 PM PDT by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Stingy Dog

Well,Well,at least Lee Peterson has one other person in this Universe that believes like him.No further comment on your point of view. Thankfully, Scott, the murderer of his wife and only son is locked away for good and hopefully the full sentence will be imposed sooner rather than later!


77 posted on 05/06/2005 1:53:37 PM PDT by True Republican Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I have not read it yet.


78 posted on 05/06/2005 1:55:46 PM PDT by This Just In ((In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Did you know that the Sr. Peterson's are trying to find a publisher to write a book? They can't find one who will publish their book is what I heard. These people are not delusional they are COMPLETELY DISHONEST. They KNOW that Snott killed Laci and Conner. They knew from the beginning. Anne Bird summed it up in her book by quoting Jackie as saying " The IMPORTANT thing is we MUST PROTECT Scott"!! GAG ME!!


79 posted on 05/06/2005 2:06:28 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks should separate from central Canada and join together with Alberta !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Stingy Dog; PureTrouble; Howlin
"He will win on appeal and be set free."

"I hope his conviction will be reversed."

Wow! Voices of reason in the chaos of the lynch mob! I'm impressed!

I agree with both of you.

No evidence worthy of a conviction.

Howlin', I copied you just to get you all stirred up again! :-)

80 posted on 05/06/2005 2:06:29 PM PDT by El Gran Salseron (We're going to grease the tracks of our tanks with their guts! GSPatton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson