To: Lancey Howard
Robert Parton, a lawyer and former FBI agent who resigned last month as senior investigative counsel for the inquiry, gave the documents to U.S. lawmakers even though he signed a confidentiality agreement when he was hired and certified when he left that he possessed no documents related to his work.
15 posted on
05/06/2005 9:59:07 AM PDT by
ConservativeMan55
(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
To: ConservativeMan55
Robert Parton, a lawyer and former FBI agent who resigned last month as senior investigative counsel for the inquiry, gave the documents to U.S. lawmakers even though he signed a confidentiality agreement when he was hired and certified when he left that he possessed no documents related to his work. You watch... the Leftist UN Apologists will make how he obtained the documents the issue, rather than what's contained in the documents. Just ask Manuel Miranda.
20 posted on
05/06/2005 10:01:29 AM PDT by
So Cal Rocket
(Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
To: ConservativeMan55
I think he's going to need to be a client of a witness protection program realll soon...
21 posted on
05/06/2005 10:01:51 AM PDT by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: ConservativeMan55
....Parton gave his committee the papers after getting a subpoena last Friday..... Attorney Davis said Parton had been told he would be held in contempt of Congress if he informed the Volcker panel or the United Nations of the subpoena before providing the documents..... Hyde provided no details about the papers' contents but said he hoped there would be no attempt by the Volcker panel or the United Nations to punish Parton.That is VERY interesting.
To: ConservativeMan55
Whistle blower protection for this whistle-blower?
42 posted on
05/06/2005 10:23:06 AM PDT by
dts32041
(Two words that shouldn't be used in the same sentence Grizzly bear and violate.)
To: ConservativeMan55
...gave the documents to U.S. lawmakers even though he signed a confidentiality agreement when he was hired and certified when he left that he possessed no documents related to his work.In other words, he decided not to participate in the cover up any longer.
205 posted on
05/06/2005 11:32:49 AM PDT by
Wolfstar
(U.S.M.C. -- when it absolutely, positively has to be destroyed over night)
To: ConservativeMan55
Such agreements are void if they involve criminal conduct like concealing or abetting a crime.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson