I'm really gonna miss JAG!
Posted on 05/06/2005 5:45:39 AM PDT by Born Conservative
Maryland woman hires attorney, says cops refuse to give her copy of her 911 call.
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Maryland woman who told authorities U.S. Rep. Don Sherwood choked her in his Washington apartment has hired a law firm and says police have refused to give her a copy of her 911 call.
Cynthia Ore, 29, of Rockville, said she initially made the request months ago, but is pursuing it now after being encouraged by friends and family members to take legal action.
In an interview Wednesday, Ore said she believes Washington, D.C., police were more concerned about the welfare of Sherwood, a Republican from Tunkhannock, when they responded to his apartment at 1 p.m. Sept. 15.
“Who would you help, a young girl or a member of Congress?” asked Ore, who said she has lived in fear since the incident. “He lives in the Hill House so they knew. It’s mostly congressmen and also senators.”
Attorney Darcy A. Shoop confirmed Thursday that the Rockville, Md., law firm she works for has been hired by Ore, but Shoop wouldn’t comment further on the law firm’s plans.
Ore said several police officers responded to the scene and were coming into and out of the apartment. She said the officers removed Sherwood from the apartment, then took him into his bedroom, while an officer talked with her.
While inside the apartment, the officers walked around the apartment and dug through her personal items, such as clothes she had there, she said.
A Washington Metropolitan Police report states that Ore told police she locked herself in a bathroom and called 911 after Sherwood “choked her for no apparent reason” while giving her a backrub in his D Street apartment.
Sherwood, 64, told police he was giving Ore a backrub when she “jumped up” and ran to the bathroom, the report stated.
Police said they saw no visible injuries on Ore and had trouble getting to the bottom of the story.
“Based on interviews with both parties and no physical evidence of injury to (Ore), there was no probable cause to make an arrest or reasonable cause to believe (Ore) was assaulted,” the report stated.
“Both parties have left out significant information or are not willing to discuss in detail what actually happened,” the police incident report says, noting that Ore “did not seem to be of sound mind.”
Ore admits she was frazzled when talking with police.
“I was shocked. I was frozen,” said Ore, who works in her family’s restaurant business.
“It was not my purpose to send him to prison. I was just trying to get out of there OK.”
Ore said Sherwood, a married man, was angry because she showed up to the apartment late that afternoon.
While police say she “changed the subject several times,” Ore insists she never withdrew her statement to police and believes they didn’t give her complaint proper attention.
Sherwood has previously declined to discuss specifics of the incident and described Ore as a casual acquaintance. On Tuesday Sherwood issued an apology “for the pain and embarrassment I have caused my family and my supporters.”
Ore disputed Sherwood’s characterization of their relationship and said they have been lovers since 1999, when they met at a Young Republicans meeting.
The officer who wrote the report, Nicholas Deciutiis, has not commented on the incident.
Speaking in general terms on Thursday, a spokesman for the department said officers should know where high-ranking officials live, but he said those officials do not receive preferential treatment.
“Nobody’s above the law,” said Master Patrol Officer Maurice Thompson. “It behooves you to know who the high-ranking people are. Sometimes things are handled more delicately because it could draw media attention. If someone’s dog ran away, no one would care. But if the president’s dog ran away, it would draw media attention.”
Ore says she was denied a copy of the 911 tape by police in November. The Times Leader also has asked for a copy of the tape and was told it would not be released without a court order.
Sherwood did not return a call Thursday for comment. An attempt to reach Sherwood or his wife at their home on Sherwood Lane in Tunkhannock Township Thursday afternoon was also unsuccessful. A woman who identified herself as Sherwood’s sister-in-law said no one was at the home. She declined further comment.
Ann doesn't have children, but this um..."lady" is a little rough looking.
Look again, it says "29" not "39."
Old enough maybe, but there's no way she's even in the same class as Ann's ugliest dog. Putting her and Ann into the same thought is an insult to Ann.
Paul
Arms and hands say she's prolly 29. Face says she's not chemically independent....
*grrr* lol
Yeah, I admit I noticed that, but I've run into a few women where that was not always a reliable indicator.
So, to recap, you've been 39 for seven years.
That will work! ;-D
I think that it is probably not a very flattering picture of her. (more on her anyone???? - google turns up nothing, which in itself is odd...is this her real name?)
And no one has commented, but, what's with the band-aid on her left arm?
As for the age questions, both sherwood and she acknowledge they met at a College Republican event. So - if she is 29, and they met 6 years ago, yeah, I could see that making sense.
(S)he is rough looking, but we haven't seen Mrs. Sherwood. she may look like Janet Reno or Madelyn Halfbright.
But let's not forget, looks may spark an attraction, but if this 'woman' made him feel like a man and the Mrs. didn't, that's what led to the affair.
Maybe she was born during a Leap Year, and she REALLY believes she's only 29....
Maybe she's counting in dog years.
I heard yesterday on a local talk show. She sounded like a real gem.
Kinda reminds one of an old punch line...
"Well... normally we ride the camel into town."
The cross is a nice touch...
That's a rough 29. As Indiana Jones said, "It's not the years but the mileage"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.