[MinuteGal]

Why don't you print what the Raj Head actually said, Mr. Editor?

"What?", you say.....I'ts too filthy for your rag of a newspaper?????

You're a yellow-bellied weasel.

I'll bet that if Ann used "gloryosky" in her speech, the word would be in your headline....in caps, yet

Leni

[Arrowhead1952]

"What?", you say.....I'ts too filthy for your rag of a newspaper?????

No kidding. They did have the filthy ex, impeached, rapist splashed all over the front page with all the hateful liberals swooning over him.

[Enterprise]

Ann and others have pointed out that the question by Raj was not relevant to anything being discussed. He may as well have asked about the kangaroos in Australia.

But to show how odd and disconnected his question was, remember that the liberals have praised the U.S. Supreme Court in its ruling in Lawrence V. Texas. The ruling established the right for gays to have the "dignity" of anal sex in privacy. One would assume therefore that if it applies to gays in the privacy of their own homes, then it should also apply to heterosexuals, and as such, it should not be an issue. Now in Raj's fevered mind he was trying to make a point, however obscure and looney.

I think though that Ann may have missed the opportunity for one of those retorts which reverberate through the decades, and it could have gone like this:

Raj: "What about all those conservative men who go home and ____ their wife in the ____?"

Ann: "And is that what YOUR husband does to you?"