To: MikeJ75
What is the difference between bottling up nominees in committee and bottling them up by parliamentary procedure? Nothing. Is either unconstitutional? No. The GOP is wasting time and energy. Either you've got the stones to exercise power or you don't. Instead they pretend to be shocked and do nothing. What a joke.
I heard Rush yesterday trying to argue there is a difference, but all he could do was call the author of the piece he was quoting a "hack." Simple ad hominem. Go and read the transcript. It was one of the weakest, lamest arguments I've ever heard from Rush.
If they want the judges they should go for it or else quit whining.
3 posted on
05/05/2005 12:11:56 PM PDT by
Huck
(One day the lion will lay down with the lamb; Until that day comes, I want America to be the lion.)
To: Huck
I agree. All the GOP has done to this point is slip and slide in the mud. They do not have their feet firmly planted on the ground, are not pushing ahead, full bore. They are weak kneed, limped spined, puny wannabees. They are accomplishing very little with the power they have. As it makes me shudder to think about it, imagine what the socialists would be doing right now if they had the WH and the numbers in Congress the GOP has? Geeze, we would be in trouble. The GOP, the party with little spine.
34 posted on
05/05/2005 12:49:04 PM PDT by
RetiredArmy
(IF YOU HATE DEMOCRATS - CLAP YOUR HANDS!!! clap clap clap)
To: Huck
If they want the judges they should go for it or else quit whining.
What good is a hammer if you won't use it? Other than Tom Delay the Republicans are a bunch of girls that don't want to do anything that might mess their hair up.
37 posted on
05/05/2005 12:53:16 PM PDT by
isthisnickcool
(You must respect my a-tor-it-tah!)
To: Huck
I do not believe that they really want them.
58 posted on
05/05/2005 8:09:33 PM PDT by
sport
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson