Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hosepipe; Dimensio
Really.. so we're supposed to get into a who shot John on who uncovered any evo "fakes"... surely you're joking..

Son, *YOU'RE* the one who raised that very topic when you asked a question which contained the (false) claim about who does or does not uncover "fakes":

How come the fakes are almost never found by Evos.?.
You compounded this when you wrote:
[ Just who do you think are finding the fakes? ]
Non-Evo scientists.. The Evo scientists are hampered by their own DOGMA(s)..
So now that you have been challenged to support this falsehood, *NOW* you suddenly whine, "so we're supposed to get into a who shot John on who uncovered any evo "fakes" -- well *yeah*, since you were *CLAIMING* to know who uncovered any "fakes" when you made a CLAIM about the nature of the folks who allegedly had done so, implying that you had knowledge of who it was and whether they were "evos" or "non-evos".

But *now*, when it's pointed out to you that your claim was *false*, you suddenly say it's a "joke" to expect you to know who did what at all (even though YOU were the one who RAISED that issue and made a claim about it as if you had some sort of -- any sort of -- knowledge on the subject).

Are you really as completely addle-brained as you appear, or is it just some sort of bizarre act?

I like to spit on my betters shoes..

Look, if you have some sort of hostility issues towards people who know more about a subject than you do, seek help, or keep it to yourself. Your personality problems are nothing to be proud of, and certainly nothing to indulge in public.

Are you my better.?.

As if that would be difficult...

569 posted on 05/06/2005 5:22:08 AM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies ]


To: Ichneumon; hosepipe; Dimensio
"Look, if you have some sort of hostility issues towards people who know more about a subject than you do, seek help, or keep it to yourself. ..

Do you have some secret info that these people don't have?:

Colin Patterson, the senior paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History, which houses the world's largest fossil collection - sixty million specimens - said this:

]"If I knew of any [evolutionary transitions], fossil or living, I would certainly have included them [in my book Evolution]"

Pierre-Paul Grasse, 30-years spent as Chair of Evolution at Sorbonne, wrote this:

"Naturalists must remember that the process of evolution is revealed only through fossil forms. A knowledge of paleontology is, therefore, a prerequisite; only paleontology can provide them with the evidence and reveal its course or mechanisms." [Evolution of Living Organisms - New York: Academic Press, 1977]

Charles Darwin: "Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely-graduated organic chain; and this; perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against the theory." David Raup [Curator of the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago]:

"We are now about 120 years after Darwin and the knowledge of the fossil record has been greatly expanded. We now have a quarter of a million fossil species, but the situation hasn't changed much. ... We have even fewer examples of evolutionary transition than we had in Darwin's time."

586 posted on 05/06/2005 6:35:05 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (The DemocRAT Party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies ]

To: Ichneumon
[ The some Evo scientists are hampered by their own DOGMA(s).. ]
Some Creationists do the same.. of course..

Didn't like that huh.. (making a note that you know thats its true too)
A "feather" evolving from a "scale", really.. As complex as a feather is, a feather would be nothing unless the bones evolved at the same time.. not to speak of the makeup of the very BLOOD that those bones make.. and if they didn't happen, why feathers.?.. Which are very complex stuctures to even be called feathers.. A million(pick a number) iterations before it could be called a feather would be useless.. until it finally became a "feather"..

Occams Razor precludes evolution (as its been displayed to me) but then the same Razor precludes the Genesis Chapter One account too.. What happened, happened, true, but I think theres some OTHER explanation than evolution or the bible.. or maybe a mix of both systems even..

I mock both dogmatons equally occasionally.. and am not embarassed.. Lieing to themselves is what dogmatons do.. A Dogmatons bark is worse that its bite.. for they are guarding dogma.. thats what they do.. no surpise there.. For fear of evolving into a higher intellectual life form maybe.. i.e. they are protecting something..

What are you proctecting.?...
I am proctecting nothing leaving myself open to be bitten by dogmatons.. both kinds.. Didn't really want to be a victim but somebodys got to do it I guess. Why not me.?.

By the way, good morning, and God Bless you.. d;-)~ Pssst..

603 posted on 05/06/2005 10:27:58 AM PDT by hosepipe (This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson