Why should I.?. go google..
He's right, you're wrong, deal with it. You posted your fantasy (that the few fakes in paleontology were uncovered by "non-evos") as a fact. You were wrong. The few frauds in paleontology were detected and exposed by other "evos". Anyone who actually *has* "gone Google" would know this -- that leaves out people who just post their fact-free prejudices without bothering to learn what the truth might be, such as yourself.
Retract your false claim, if you want to be honorable about it.
Or don't, and join the long list of other creationists who either can't accept that their presumptions and propaganda could possibly be wrong, or aren't honest enough to admit it.
Knowing you somewhat you're not joking..
I would engage this subject if I cared, I don't.. I don't care if some bones(and the storys invented to explain them) are real or fake.. If all the bones(fossils) are as reported I would still question them.. and the stories invented to explain them I take with a grain of salt.. I don't take as fact the "creationist" views of how life started and I take palentology (as a science) on about the same level of fact..
So there is nothing it this for me to gain.. except playing with you and Demensio.. which I did, and am now.. Your opinion is just an opinion.. they are like elbows you know..
I like to spit on my betters shoes.. Are you my better.?.
Signed;
Not buying palentology as other than a pseudo-science.. And am suspicious of any myth invented to explain how "feathers" came into being.. especially from "scales"