Posted on 05/04/2005 5:59:04 AM PDT by OESY
I am asking you what makes YOUR trashy talk better than what you have accused Laura of saying.
Get it or avoid it?
That being said, I would bet good money that you're either a Democrat or a third-party irrelevant.
I'm not 'demonizing' you 'farmer', I just think you're a gutless slug.
"And on Laura Bush's blue comedy routine this weekend, she's entitled. Too many people have this pre-concieved notion of her as a Sunday School teacher who doesn't "let her hair down." She shattered that notion.
The comments were not meant for your four-year old watching at home. It was late Saturday and on C-Span. If your four year-old is up late watching C-Span, I'd have to question your judgement."
Agreed on both accounts. I found Mrs. Bush's comments to be pretty hilarious, considering the source, and attached no other meaning to them than her poking fun at her husband.
Coincidentally, your "not meant for 4 year olds" is also applicable to "South Park" as well.
My apologies for tampering with your virgin mind.
This coming from a poster who said folks on the other side of the debate needed to get laid. Yeah, Howlin, you'd keep this debate civil if the other side would just play nice.
That's a far funnier joke than anything Laura said that night.
Just judging by the descriptions, I've been pretty skeptical.
Though, if you're enthused, I suppose it's worth a try!
:)
I just don't know what they're going to do to replicate the force of the original radio scripts, BBC TV series, and Douglas Adams novels.
I guess another thing that threw me off was that they couldn't even get Roger Ebert-who's willing to schill for any turkey out there-to give it a positive review.
There are a few film critics, e.g. James Bowman, Gene Lyons, Leah Rozen, V.A. Musetto, who I can usually rely upon to give an honest evaluation of what they've seen.
I'll definitely have to think it over now that you've recommended it.
But nine bucks?!
Eek.
I'll have to think it over.
:0)
-good times, G.J.P. (Jr.)
Points well taken. You didn't read my apology, and as I have pointed out here, my expression is not justified by the failure of the first lady to use judgement on this occasion: The First Lady is not in competition with Chris Rock for laughs around the gas lights. It was a very low moment for Republican first families.
Hmmm, I hadn't heard that.
Good thing it's 616 and not 919! :)
I think these threads prove my point.
As I said before, you are TOO invested in this story.
" But her off-color stripper and horse jokes crossed the line. Can you blame Howard Stern for feeling peeved and perplexed? And let's face it: If Teresa ("I'm cheeky!") Heinz Kerry had delivered Mrs. Bush's First Lady Gone Mildly Wild routine, social conservative pundits would be up in arms over her bad taste and lack of dignity."
Thanks Texas. What Michelle said today is an almost verbatim transcript of what I posted on that thread yesterday, and the Bush bots swarmed and tried to rip my head off! Hypocrisy-on-parade : )
ROTF....
That's what so damn funny about all this! These extremists have gone full cirle and turned into the Dems they profess to hate!!
Howlin, don't whine about the mud the other side is throwing as you toss your own.
As I said before, you are TOO invested in this story.
Howlin, I would venture you have made three to four times more posts on this subject than I have.
But I'm the one who is TOO invested?
Talk about projection.
It wasn't just the values vote that elected him. In my case, I voted for Bush, because I trusted him to do his best to defend the country.
Now one of the main reasons the terrorists have targeted us is that they see our society as decadent. One thing that they as decadent is our protection of free speech, including racy humor, under the aegis of the First Amendment.
In that light, Laura Bush's off-color jokes, in a forum intended for adults, were giving a metaphorical finger to the terrorists. She was, indeed, standing up for one of the main reasons that I voted for President Bush.
"This coming from a poster who said folks on the other side of the debate needed to get laid"
She just has the guts to post what everyone else is thinking.
Most great comedians who have withstood the test of time used little or no profanity. If something is funny, you don't need an F U or bastard or $hit to make it funnier. This is all but lost on people today.
He was man enough to apologize for his over-the-line comments yesterday.
Meanwhile, his oppenents are still rationalizing away their personal attacks.
Who are the gutless ones now?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.