I would not rule out voting for McGreevey because of his sexuality. He does not use that particular part of his anatomy for signing bills or any other part of the job. It is more his fondness for taxes than his fondness for menfolk that rules him out in my book.
Also, the full parameters of his financial improprieties was never explored as a result of his "explosive" admission, because everybody had to pretend, all of a sudden, that they had no inkling of what we had all known about for years. If he ever ran for office, you can bet his opponent would hammer him on corruption 24/7, and let the anti-gay vote take care of itself. No way would McGreevey be able to put together 50%.
Oh, please. Did you just feel a cold chill across your keyboard? Brother, are you on the wrong web site.
Being gay carries with it a lot of baggage----all of it anathema to conservatives. Viscerally liberal already, McGay would hew to a left liberal agenda reinforced by the gay political mafia.
Although there are fiscally conservative gays, most of them are blatantly pro-abortion, pro-Planned Parenthood, pro-ACLU, and so on. Not very amenable to conservatives.