[Liz]

I would not rule out voting for McGreevey because of his sexuality. He does not use that particular part of his anatomy for signing bills or any other part of the job.

Oh, please. Did you just feel a cold chill across your keyboard? Brother, are you on the wrong web site.

Being gay carries with it a lot of baggage----all of it anathema to conservatives. Viscerally liberal already, McGay would hew to a left liberal agenda reinforced by the gay political mafia.

Although there are fiscally conservative gays, most of them are blatantly pro-abortion, pro-Planned Parenthood, pro-ACLU, and so on. Not very amenable to conservatives.

[gridlock]

Brother, are you on the wrong web site.

Gee, whiz, Liz! I went on to catalog the reasons why I would not vote for Mr. McGreevey. I don't support him for a lot of reasons. It is not necessary or even desirable to generalize these things from the fact that "His Truth is that he is a Gay American."

Not all gays carry the same baggage. But their luggage is usually fabulous!

[gridlock]

Frankly, I have a sneaking hunch that McGreevey is not as gay as he lets on...

But that's just me. Maybe I have the tinfoil wrapped too tight. It's shiny side out, right?