Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Proud Conservative2

First, I'm not sure the victim would have been "stuck." Do you have any evidence that the punishment would have been imposed against the victim's desire?

Secondly, it is punishment in the sense that it effectively made the man the slave to the woman for the rest of his life.

Thirdly, as I said, the woman was likely not to be married by anyone else because she was 'damaged' by the man, which was the very reason for the law's existence - to guarantee someone would be there to provide for her. Her parents wouldn't be there forever.


36 posted on 05/03/2005 10:34:48 PM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: MitchellC

duh....


51 posted on 05/05/2005 9:48:41 AM PDT by Proud Conservative2 (Protect America....Help stamp out gutless wonders in the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson