Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pa mom

My convictions will go with me into marriage, despite the fact that I'm not Catholic. It's not moot. Opposing abortion at any stage in any way is never moot. This is not a religious mandate, it's my personal opposition to killing unborn babies even "some percent of the time"

There are unabortive methods, Disphragms, spermicides, condoms, sponges, film... So my opposition is not to your using birth control, it's using the killing kind.

Why choose the abortive kind for reasons other than convienence?


484 posted on 05/05/2005 3:44:11 PM PDT by FreepinforTerri (Send Attorney George J. Felos Rebukes via Email. His email is proofg@aol.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies ]


To: FreepinforTerri

Ok, hypothetical situation.

Someone needs to take birth control, and has no other options. Yet she still wishes to have relations with her husband. What if she abstains on ovulation days (Catholics support the "rhythm method", and now you know which days these will be thanks to the pill), and also used other precautions, such as a condom or diaphragm? The pill would then never be an abortificant.

Is that ok?


488 posted on 05/05/2005 3:47:22 PM PDT by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies ]

To: FreepinforTerri

The post was about birth control and child spacing. That was all. If you are not Catholic, you are morally able to use a condom.


489 posted on 05/05/2005 3:47:33 PM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson