Posted on 05/03/2005 3:21:39 AM PDT by Pharmboy
Do either of you have access to the picture of David Kendall sitting on his briefcase during the impeachment hearings?
"It's totally in the hands of the Republicans. How they handle it. Which makes me shudder with fear, believe me, knowing that the "professional campaign managers" in the Republican Party have blown more opportunities at bringing clarity to issues than the Palestinians have blown opportunities for real peace."
Unfortunate but true. Hillary can win if she sets the agenda - that broad brush of 'fear','religous extremism', and other words that set the tone AND if the Republicans put up a non-contestant like Dole again. No, I am hoping we get someone capable of articulating conservative TRUTH; window dressing won't cut it. Along with defense 'sense', gun rights, immigration reform, tax policy, and abortion law will be the primary factors in making the ideas work.
Defeating her in '06 is a great idea (though I agree that the GOP candidates don't look very strong at the moment), but it needs to be a political destruction that can't rise from the dead for a run in '08, not a mere defeat.
There is one other factor not yet considered, and that is the internal problems the Democrats will face as they argue with each other on why they lost again in '06. DCC Chariman Howard Dean may be the best secret weapon against the Clintons that we have....
Hillary is a tyrant who must always be in control of everything. Does anyone believe she did not order the now indicted David Rosen to phony up reports? Does anyone think he did that on his own?
Guess what, NY TIMES? You no longer have a monopoly on what is news and what people should believe. Those of us in pajamas now have our say. Go ask Dan Rather.
Actually, the man behind the criminal indictment would typically be a federal prosecutor. And the man who committed the felonies would also have something to do with it. But I guess Hernandez knows best.
As usual, this is total B.S. from Kendall. Without FreeRepublic, he would get away with it. The case proceeds. What was thrown out was thrown out because the statute of limitations had tolled. The Clintons have tried to stop this at the trial level, the appellate level, and the California Supreme Court level. Lost, lost, lost. The case proceeds. He insults the California Supreme Court who determined that the case has merit. I wish they would hold him in contempt or gag him.
The Biased Liberal media is EAGER to report that Hitlery is
"Moving to the center."Ha! Yeah, right. When pigs fly.
Check out her "Move to the center" here, per the ACU. She
went from "10" in 2003 to a GOOSE EGG (0) in 2004, on a
scale of 100 = perfect conservative.Moving to the center? He**, she's farther left in 2004 than
EVER!
Click here or on the pic for the article.
Senator Hillary Clinton (D)
New York
Democrat, Years of Service: 4
ACU Ratings for Senator Clinton: Year 2004 0 Year 2003 10 Lifetime 9
Since when does Hillary permit questions she doesn't want to answer to be asked?
I heard that hideous cackle in response to a few of Tim Russert's questions on MTP. And there was one other interview she gave where she used it a few times...the interviewer escapes me for now. It might have been an old Katie Couric/Today Show interview.
Your prediction that Hillary will not debate is right on!
She will NEVER expose herself in any forum that will force her to answer questions that she has no clue as to what the answers might be.
If she is up against Condi, the contrast would be striking.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.