"Uh, yeah, sure. Realism to the max. It has a suitcase that allows someone to melt down every nuke in America. It has corporate interests in bed with Muslim terrorists because, hey, we can't have just plain ol' Muslim terrorists acting alone because that might get CAIR upset. It has terrorists engaged in several simultaneous plots, each of which individually would be almost impossible to pull off. And it has a small band of anti-terrorism experts working in a center that more resembles a soap opera than a serious agency."
And your point would be??? That Osama couldn't fly planes into the Twin Towers because that's too unreal? That Zarqawi doen't chop off heads because that would be too barbaric to show on the unreal "24"? That the Cole wasn't almost sunk by brazen "unrealistic" terrorists? That Tora Bora wasn't honeycombed with an unbelievable array of tunnels?
What IS your guys point? That you have zero, zilch, nada, imagination?
Uh, the author claimed the show was realistic. I showed that it wasn't. Sorry that bothers you so much.