Yes I agree it is radical. However, no matter how radical some are, it does not change the validity of the issue.
And casting all who oppose the murder of Terri as radicals does not prove your viewpoint either. It is a diversion to make the whole issue appear insignificant.
It is not insignificant and I do not care how ridiculous I may appear to those who wish to allow progressive changing of laws to permit state supported killing of unwanteds.
Exactly where did I say that? As a matter of fact I was pointing out that the other poster had not said that either. If there is a diversion being created it is by the people who do spout such radical statements, and calling them radical is a kindness. And, yes, it does change the validity of the issue. Who is to believe such people who advocate vigilantism and violence? People who believe and repeat everything spouted in the media? I remember a time when we were skeptical of that. It would be nice if you would answer my questions instead of attempting to twist what I said.