Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClancyJ
And casting all who oppose the murder of Terri as radicals does not prove your viewpoint either.

Exactly where did I say that? As a matter of fact I was pointing out that the other poster had not said that either. If there is a diversion being created it is by the people who do spout such radical statements, and calling them radical is a kindness. And, yes, it does change the validity of the issue. Who is to believe such people who advocate vigilantism and violence? People who believe and repeat everything spouted in the media? I remember a time when we were skeptical of that. It would be nice if you would answer my questions instead of attempting to twist what I said.

169 posted on 05/02/2005 10:53:28 AM PDT by unbalanced but fair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: unbalanced but fair

You have had ample explanation of what people are upset about. You do not listen but divert attention. You have no just arguments.

In fact, I would wonder about your stands is this was about the Patriot Act, or about gun laws. Bet there would be a vast different view on government involvement then.

Funny, actually there is no difference. The government is killing an American citizen because the "elite" determined she was unworthy of life.

Yet, no concern from the government uninvolvement in our lives crowd. Wonder why.


190 posted on 05/02/2005 11:38:05 AM PDT by ClancyJ (Florida Motto: Send me your weak, frail, elderly - and we will give them 'rest'".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson