Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pontiac GTO again flexes its muscles
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | May 2, 2005 | DAN JEDLICKA AUTO WRITER

Posted on 05/02/2005 4:25:19 AM PDT by Chi-townChief

Critics of last year's reborn Pontiac GTO coupe disliked the car because it didn't look rakish, as did most versions of the iconic 1960s GTO muscle car. But the 2005 GTO looks sportier, with such things as new hood scoops, and its more potent 400-horsepower V-8 makes it the fastest GTO ever.

No wonder GTO sales in the first quarter of this year were up 81 percent over the same year-ago period, with 3,261 units sold. Pontiac spokesman Jim Hopson said the GTO is "red hot in Southern California, which isn't exactly one of our biggest markets. Los Angeles is our No. 2 market for the GTO, and it's been a long time since we've been able to say that about any Pontiac.''

The rear-wheel-drive GTO is true to the original 1960s muscle car formula of putting a big engine in a brawny mid-size rear-drive coupe. However, the new GTO is put together in Australia and has a definite foreign-car feel.

My red test GTO looked slick and fast. Giving it a handsome retro-style 1960s GTO body would have caused excessive wind noise and fuel-robbing aerodynamic drag. Many have forgotten that the first GTO was a boxy 1964 Tempest coupe with a GTO option package containing a muscular V-8, sport suspension and special tires and trim. A distinct GTO model didn't arrived until 1965.

Sleeker, more powerful GTOs were sold between the 1964 and 1971 models. Stiff insurance premiums and safety and emissions laws led the last GTO to be a boxy, low-powered 1974 Pontiac Ventura.

Last year's GTO had a modified Chevrolet Corvette 350-horsepower V-8 and blended speed with exceptional handling. Classic GTOs mainly were known for straight-line acceleration; they didn't handle or brake well by today's higher standards. Features such as the 2005 GTO's traction control system and anti-lock brakes simply didn't exist. Even race cars lacked tires comparable to the superwide 45-series tires on the current GTO.

The GTO had lukewarm 2004 sales of 13,569 units -- about 5,000 short of projected sales. Many of the growing number of fast-car buyers were waiting for the $24,600 300-horsepower 2005 Ford Mustang GT V-8 coupe or got the rakish Chrysler 300C sedan with a 325-horsepower Hemi V-8. The 300C costs $800 more than the $32,295 GTO.

Things are picking up for the 2005 GTO. Sales through March this year aren't close to those of the GT or 300C, but totaled 3,261 cars -- up from 1,801 in the same 2004 period. The GTO is a bargain if only because it has a 400-horsepower modified V-8 from the new Corvette, which starts at $43,710.

The neck-snapping GTO hits 60 mph in 4.7 seconds with the optional $695 six-speed manual gearbox and 4.6 with the standard four-speed automatic transmission. Car and Driver magazine found it does 0-100 mph in 11.7 seconds.

Torque is a massive 400 pound-feet, which means the manual gearbox isn't needed for startling performance. The automatic transmission is expected to be chosen by approximately half of GTO buyers, which was the case with last year's model.

Estimated fuel economy with the manual gearbox is 16 mpg in the city -- but 25 on highways because the V-8 loafs in top overdrive gear. Figures with the automatic are 16 and 21, partly because the automatic isn't a five- or six-speed unit.

The GTO has lots of comfort and convenience equipment, including air conditioning, leather upholstery, power accessories and a 200-watt, 10-speaker sound system. The only option other than the manual transmission is a hood without the scoops, and it's a "no-cost delete option.''

No sunroof, heated seats, navigation system or side airbags are offered. That's partly because the GTO was brought to market quickly and is an Americanized version of the Monaro model from General Motors' Australian Holden branch. Sunroofs and heated seats aren't popular in Australia, and Pontiac thought there would be little demand for the navigation system here.

GM used a Monaro because it had no rear-drive American car it could modify to create a new GTO. Behind the car is GM product czar Bob Lutz, who thought there had been too long a wait for the return of the fabled GTO.

The GTO has no frills, except for a few small "GTO'' fender badges and a discreet "6.0 liter'' badge on the trunk that signifies that it has the new V-8, which has "GTO'' lettering on its valve covers. The revised rear fascia has a bumper that better separates two large exhaust outlets in the new split exhaust system, which has polished exhaust outlet tips. As with exotics such as Ferrari, front brake calipers are painted red (with the GTO logo on them) to make them stand out behind the large 17-inch spoked alloy wheels. A new driver foot rest is a handy item on long trips.

The quiet, refined GTO is comfortable, but a kick to drive. The car stops as well as it goes, with larger new brakes and a linear-action pedal for smooth stops. The variable ratio power steering is quick, although a little heavy. The supple all-independent suspension results in a smooth, nicely controlled ride. Handling is impressive, helped by the traction control and a limited-slip differential.

Long doors are a problem in tight spots, but otherwise make it easy to get in and out of the front. There's good front room in supportive bucket seats, and the seats power forward to allow easier entry to the spacious rear area, which also has twin bucket seats. However, front seats move slowly and rear entry/exit is tight. Fixed back windows don't lower.

The leather-covered tilt-telescopic steering wheel is nicely sized, but gauge numbers are small and it's hard to read the odometer and fuel range numbers in sunlight.

Power-window controls are on the console, instead of being more conveniently placed on the doors, which have pockets that don't hold much. The console also has a small, but deep, covered storage bin and large twin cupholders.

Although nicely shaped, the trunk is small for this fairly large 190-inch-long car because the fuel tank had to be repositioned behind the back-seat bulkhead to meet U.S. crash rules. Rear seatbacks don't fold forward to enlarge the cargo area.

The trunk lid has old-style hinges, but the hood moves up and down smoothly on twin hydraulic struts. The engine compartment has easily reached fluid filler areas, and a thick transverse race-car-style bar at the rear of the compartment helps show why the GTO has solidity that helps provide precise handling.

The GTO is a strong player for the money in the high-performance market because few under-$33,000 cars provide its driving excitement.

PONTIAC GTO PRICE $32,295

LIKES More power. Racier look. Lightning fast. Deft handling. Legendary nameplate.

DISLIKES Small trunk. Long doors awkward in tight spots. Small gauge numbers.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: automakers; boring; gto; hohum; musclecars; weakimitation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 next last
To: freedumb2003
"The new version is blasphemy."

You want "blasphemy"??

Try the new Chevy Corvette.

81 posted on 05/02/2005 6:59:36 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
"Pfft. Looks like a Sunbird with a 'tude."

That's was what I was thinkin'.

82 posted on 05/02/2005 7:01:30 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

Darth:

How'd you do that? My Ford dealer told me he couldn't do that yet...


83 posted on 05/02/2005 7:06:42 AM PDT by astounded (We don't need no stinkin' rules of engagement...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: wizr

Saw plenty of these in the rear view mirror of my Chevy Caprice.


84 posted on 05/02/2005 7:10:59 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief; Petronski; mikrofon; Charles Henrickson
the new GTO is put together in Australia

The Blunder From Down Under.

85 posted on 05/02/2005 7:12:20 AM PDT by martin_fierro (Fingers of Fury™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

Gorgeous Car!!!!!!!


86 posted on 05/02/2005 7:13:43 AM PDT by geege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

That's seemd to be the problem with ALL new cars - there's not much left unless you want to spend huge pesos.


87 posted on 05/02/2005 7:25:27 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: markedmannerf

We'll stick with the Buick Regal GS. This is my wife's car. There's nothing better than having some punk kid in a "souped up" Honda Civic or low-end Mustang come up to a light, rev up their little engine (and sometimes even flip us off) -- only to be absolutely smoked when the 240-horse, 0-60 in 6.1 seconds Buick engine kicks in.

I love seeing dejection on their faces. It's great to see the "what the hell just happened" look when their punk-mobiles get smoked by my wife's "Grandma Car."

88 posted on 05/02/2005 7:35:23 AM PDT by AlaninSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
I had a '68 Camaro. Non SS or RS.
It had a 427 L-88, with a Muncie M22 and a 411 12 bolt posi.

Scary fun. I got about 10mpg if I drove it careful. Which was very hard to do. But I think my miles per gallon changed to yards per gallon when I started to play a little.

With todays cars, and their tiny miniscule engines, can pull the kind of power they do, out of them, with todays technology. Imagine what they could do with a big inch motor.

YEE-HAAAAA

89 posted on 05/02/2005 7:36:49 AM PDT by mountn man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Your Caprice sounds a bit unusual. Was it factory? They were not exactly touted as muscle cars. But then, GM did make a few 'sleepers'.


90 posted on 05/02/2005 7:42:34 AM PDT by wizr (Freedom ain't free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: AlaninSA

Buick had a chance with the retro '41 retractable hardtop coupe. It was gorgeous, and came with big horses under the hood, too, as I remember. If made for the 'mainstream', it would probably cost like a Hummer anyway.


91 posted on 05/02/2005 7:46:50 AM PDT by wizr (Freedom ain't free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Now thats a muscle car, a Charger with a 426 Hemi!!!


92 posted on 05/02/2005 7:48:35 AM PDT by aspiring.hillbilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

They must have put the woman who was in charge of Oldmobile in charge of the GTO project.

It is PATHETIC!

obviously the suits have no clue what makes a muscle car.

(when men were men, cars were cars, and women were grateful.)


93 posted on 05/02/2005 7:52:12 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Eagle9

sigh, detroit has no concept of beauty in the 2000's.

The new GTO is lines designed by a nanny.


94 posted on 05/02/2005 7:54:22 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

I dunno about this new GTO. Seems to me you can pick up a low milage C5 Corvette for less than 20k and a very nice C4 Corvette for less than 10k......either one has a lot more style and class than the import goat. Heck for 32k you might be able to find a "real GTO" in reasonable condition.


95 posted on 05/02/2005 8:07:49 AM PDT by Kokojmudd (Today's Liberal is Tomorrow's Prospective Flying Saucer Abductee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
GM just cancelled the Zeta platform that was to accomodate the next generation GTO as well as the new Camaro and Buick Velite (which to me looks like a Toyota Solara.

Where GM models stand on inventory, sales

Inventories, sales and incentives for some General Motors' cars and trucks:
Vehicle
Days supply1
Year-to-date sales
Chg. from last year
Current offers
Buick
Buick Rendezvous SUV
93
13,075
-23.3%
$4,500
Buick LaCrosse sedan
95
19,281
NA2
$1,500
Buick Terraza minivan
149
3,286
NA2
$2,000
Individual models
Saab 9-5 sedan/wagon
216
1,207
-31.3%
$349/month lease offer
Chevy SSR pickup
134
2,703
-11.9%
$1,000
Chevy Monte Carlo sedan
86
9,773
-29.6%
$4,000
Hummer H2
58
4,313
-31.5%
$1,000
Minivans
Saturn Relay
129
4,076
NA2
$1,250 cash back
Chevy Uplander/Venture
78/77
17,331
3.3%
$2,000/$4,000
Pontiac Montana
160
5,205
-39.8%
$4,000
Trucks
Chevy TrailBlazer SUV
85
47,558
-22.9%
$4,000
Chevy Avalanche SUV
101
15,006
-22.4%
$3,000
Chevy Tahoe SUV
108
32,854
-22.5%
$4,000
Chevy Suburban
128
18,234
-29.2%
$3,500 cash back
GMC Yukon
117
15,127
-26.1%
$4,000
1 — Number of days needed to sell all vehicles in inventory, based on the selling rate in March. The industry average for March is 69 days.
2 — These vehicles were not on sale this time last year.

Sources: Automotive News, AutoData, GM BuyPower Web site

96 posted on 05/02/2005 8:09:34 AM PDT by AgentEcho (If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: astounded

Are you a current SVT owner? I am. 2003 SVT Cobra Terminator.


97 posted on 05/02/2005 8:12:38 AM PDT by DarthVader (Liberal Democrat = Fat, drunk and stupid is a hell of a way to go through life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: wizr
Came from GM with this factory-made motor. 396 with 427 heads, 4 bolt mains, mechanical lifters and a major cam. They also put this motor in the Corvette in 66, before the 427 took its place for simplicity's sake.
The car was red/orange bronze with white vinyl and the auto shifter was on the floor. It had regular GM wheels and hubcaps, full factory mufflers and resonators (little mufflers just in front of the tailpipes) so, other than the lopey engine idle, it looked like "dad's car." It was a complete sleeper that dusted nearly everything around.
98 posted on 05/02/2005 8:17:17 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: markedmannerf
I agree, the "new" Mustang is actually a pretty nice design if you like American Cars. I have no idea how it drives or if the mechanics are any good in it.

Now I wish BMW would rebuild the 2002 and correct some of the problems that model had because it was an awsome design, great balance, cornering etc. Problem was that over time the rear shock mounts rusted thru.

99 posted on 05/02/2005 8:18:47 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

No, I'm not. You must have what could be called "first dibs"???

My dealer told me he would take my name and contact me when the order book for the GT500 becomes available. By hook, or by crook...it takes me back to 1967.


100 posted on 05/02/2005 8:23:30 AM PDT by astounded (We don't need no stinkin' rules of engagement...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson