Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oil falls near $49 as U.S. supplies swell ($49.11/bbl)
Reuters ^ | May 2, 2005

Posted on 05/02/2005 3:18:09 AM PDT by RWR8189

SINGAPORE (Reuters) - Oil prices fell more than 1 percent on Monday, hovering at a 10-week low just above the $49 mark as higher OPEC supply and swelling crude stocks in the United States weighed on the market.

U.S. light crude dropped to an intraday low of $49.05 a barrel, the lowest since Feb. 22 and almost 16 percent below the record $58.28 struck on April 4.

At 0810 GMT, U.S. crude was 52 cents down at $49.20. Markets in Singapore and London were closed for a public holiday.

"It's a split market for the time being. Short term it's definitely weak if you look at stocks and OPEC production," said Tony Nunan at Mitsubishi Corp. in Tokyo.

"But medium term, three to six months out, it looks like supply could be really tight."

Prices came under selling pressure last week as U.S. crude stocks jumped by a surprising 5.5 million barrels as imports into the world's biggest comsumer surged to almost 10.9 million barrels per day (bpd), the third-highest weekly volume on record.

The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries has pledged to increase supplies to cool prices down to below $50 a barrel, which has helped to build U.S. crude stockpiles to the highest level since mid-2002.

The cartel has an official production ceiling of 27.5 million barrels per day (bpd), excluding Iraq.

"Since our last meeting in Isfahan (in mid-March) until now, there is 2 million that has been added to the market," OPEC President Sheikh Ahmad al-Fahd al-Sabah said on Monday.

"When we were in Isfahan ... the (OPEC 10) production was 27.7 million and now our real production is 29.7 million."

Including Iraqi production, OPEC's current output would beat levels of over 30 million bpd pumped late last year that took OPEC supply to 25-year highs.

Sheikh Ahmad had said the cartel would add 500,000 bpd of fresh supplies to world oil markets starting from May. But he said "by numbers, we already have more than 500,000 of real production in the market."    

OPEC, which controls half the world's crude exports, meets again on June 15 in Vienna to chart production strategy for the second half of the year.

Most of the 10 OPEC members with quotas -- Iraq is excluded -- are now producing at full tilt as the exporter group seeks to encourage stockbuilding in the coming months to create a buffer for strong demand later this year.

But dealers remain concerned over a potential gasoline supply crunch in the peak-demand summer months or a shortage of heating fuel toward the end of the year as the northern hemisphere heads into winter.

Some analysts worry that high commodity prices are starting to dent world economic growth by fueling inflation and prompting a rising trend in global interest rates.

The U.S. economy grew at its slowest pace in two years during the first quarter -- an annual rate of 3.1 percent -- fanning concerns of a possible slowdown in oil demand growth.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brent; cartel; crude; crudeoil; energyprices; funds; gas; gasoline; hedgefunds; lightsweetcrude; middleeast; northsea; nymex; oil; oilcartel; oilinventory; opec; speculation; speculators; supply; wti
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
5/02/05 Session Contract Detail for June 2005
alt alt alt
alt alt
alt alt alt alt
alt Last alt alt alt 49.11 alt alt
alt alt alt alt
alt
alt alt alt alt
alt Open High alt alt alt 49.28 alt alt
alt alt alt alt
alt
alt alt alt alt
alt Open Low alt alt alt 49.28 alt alt
alt alt alt alt
alt
alt alt alt alt
alt High alt alt alt 50.22 alt alt
alt alt alt alt
alt
alt alt alt alt
alt Low alt alt alt 49.03 alt alt
alt alt alt alt
alt
alt alt alt alt
alt Settle alt alt alt 49.72 alt alt
alt alt alt alt
alt
alt alt alt alt
alt Change alt alt alt -0.61 alt alt
alt alt alt alt
alt
alt alt alt alt
alt Open Interest alt alt alt 228331 alt alt
alt alt alt alt
alt
alt alt alt alt
alt Volume alt alt alt 0 alt alt
alt alt alt alt
alt
alt alt alt alt
alt Last Updated alt alt alt 5/02/05 05:36:40 alt alt
alt alt alt alt
alt
alt
Chart

1 posted on 05/02/2005 3:18:09 AM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Come on $20pb.


2 posted on 05/02/2005 4:23:27 AM PDT by G-Man 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I keep reading about barrel prices coming down , but I paid $2.23 at the pump yesterday.


3 posted on 05/02/2005 4:26:35 AM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Now is the time to really cut back on all unnecessary driving. The storage tanks are full, the need for heating oil is diminishing, and the distributors will either have to sell it or drink it. If every driver cuts back, prices will have to start coming down, and that will certainly help the economy.


4 posted on 05/02/2005 4:30:25 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
but I paid $2.23 at the pump yesterday

When it costs almost $30 to fill up my wife's Pontiac Sunfire, you know things have gone out of control.  I mean, come on, a dixie cup holds more liquid than that gas tank.

5 posted on 05/02/2005 4:33:57 AM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

Post for us how long it takes for a barrel of crude to be processed into its various components, specifically unleaded gasoline, and then try posting that comment again.


6 posted on 05/02/2005 4:39:07 AM PDT by chronic_loser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator

$2.06 in Maryland and $2.19 across the Pennsylvania line.


7 posted on 05/02/2005 5:11:59 AM PDT by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chronic_loser
I would guess a lot long in the past 20 or so years, since the envirowackos and nimby's prevent us from building new refineries with the newest technology.
8 posted on 05/02/2005 5:24:08 AM PDT by WakeUpAndVote (The division of powers must remain intact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: judenIh8

You're one sick puppy


10 posted on 05/02/2005 5:39:52 AM PDT by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

Eww, it got deleted from the forum but it still shows up under my posts...


11 posted on 05/02/2005 5:51:47 AM PDT by RWR8189 (Its Morning in America Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Damn, missed it ... got deleted before I returned.


12 posted on 05/02/2005 5:59:11 AM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

I find it irritating when talking heads say something like "Despite the high oil prices today, this is nothing compared to X years ago when a gallon of gas cost $3.50 by todays standards." I really dont give a flying crap how bad oil prices were 10 or 20 years ago. Gimme $0.75/Gal oil without selling us down the river!


13 posted on 05/02/2005 6:00:09 AM PDT by IronChefSakai (Life, Liberty, and Limited Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
Barrel price for oil is having less and less an impact at the pump. Our refineries are at capacity. Even if we doubled our supply of crude oil, we would still be limited by how much gasoline and deisel our refineries can produce. that's where the bottleneck is and gas prices are going to steadily increase as our demand for gasoline grows, but our supply, through our efineries, stays constant.

This situation is the shining star of the NIMBY syndrome coupled with the environmentalist agenda. No new refineries or nulcear energy plants in over 30 years! And with strong community and environmental resistance to growing our energy infrastructure, we will not have new refineries or nuclear plants for a very long time.

As demand increases with a constant supply, look for gas rationing to happen long before greater refinery capacity is created and comes on line.

14 posted on 05/02/2005 6:01:43 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IronChefSakai

Gimme? Who's going to "Gimme?"

Let the price go where it will and buy Exxon/Mobil


15 posted on 05/02/2005 6:03:36 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator

You didn't miss anything.

It was vile and disgusting.

Consider yourself lucky.


16 posted on 05/02/2005 6:06:27 AM PDT by RWR8189 (Its Morning in America Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: IronChefSakai

But it's true.


17 posted on 05/02/2005 6:07:33 AM PDT by biblewonk (John 2:4 "Woman, what does your concern have to do with Me?...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: doc30
that's where the bottleneck is and gas prices are going to steadily increase as our demand for gasoline grows, but our supply, through our efineries, stays constant.

A barrel of oil will still have a large impact on the price one pays at the pump - While you are correct about our refinery capacity (that is not the whole equation by a long shot) -

One example being we already import a large quantity of ALREADY REFINED product from the Middle East (and this has been growing since the 80's quite largely) -

We are no where near gas rationing as you suggest either - The fact is a barrel of oil will be back under the $40 price range within the next 12 months -

The one thing the GWB Administration should be doing (and should have long ago) is stop putting $45+ oil into SPR - There is at least $5 to $10 specked into a barrel right now by the energy traders....stop putting into SPR would make them all get honest in a hurry -

18 posted on 05/02/2005 6:08:17 AM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator
Damn, missed it

On the contrary, consider yourself fortunate. One of those very-tolerant DUmmy-types shat on the thread and left behind something related to his screenname.

19 posted on 05/02/2005 6:08:53 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: doc30

I think you've bought into a lot of old complaints. I don't believe that there are any strong desires by refiners to build more refineries. That would just be the SUV drivers that want cheaper gas who believe that there is a big shortage of refineries.


20 posted on 05/02/2005 6:09:33 AM PDT by biblewonk (John 2:4 "Woman, what does your concern have to do with Me?...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson