Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Megachurch's Leader Says Microsoft Is No Match
New York Times ^ | May 2, 2005 | Sarah Kershaw

Posted on 05/02/2005 3:15:13 AM PDT by infocats

REDMOND, Wash., April 29 - Before he became a born-again Christian and later a rising national star in the world of black evangelical ministers, the Rev. Ken Hutcherson started playing football because, he said, it was the best way he could think of to "hurt white people."

Dr. Hutcherson, a husky former linebacker for three National Football League teams who goes fishing with Rush Limbaugh and raises Rottweilers ("the bigger, the meaner, the better," he said of his pets), does not talk that way anymore about whites, saying his conversion to Christianity as a teenager changed all that. And a majority of the 3,500 members of his megachurch, which is based in this tidy Seattle suburb and high-tech hub, is white, as is his wife.

With a thundering charisma that makes him a hero to some and a gay-bashing bully to others, he has taken on the white mayor of Seattle, a prominent black county executive and the Washington State Legislature. In his mission to stop the legalization of gay marriage, Dr. Hutcherson has accused gay rights activists of trying to hijack and sully the civil rights movement by their comparison of the right of gays and lesbians to marry to the civil rights struggle he lived through as a poor child in Alabama in the 1950's and 60's.

Now Dr. Hutcherson, 52, known as "Hutch," and by his self-chosen nickname, "the black man," claims to be the person who forced Microsoft, situated near his Antioch Bible Church offices, to withdraw its support of a gay rights bill before the State Legislature, one it had supported the two previous years.

Dr. Hutcherson had threatened to organize a national boycott of Microsoft if it backed the legislation this year. The antidiscrimination bill was defeated by one vote in the State Senate on April 21.

But officials at Microsoft vehemently deny that the minister had anything to do with their decision not to support the bill this year; gay rights groups and employees have since criticized Microsoft, which had long enjoyed a reputation as one of the nation's most gay-friendly companies.

"We respect Dr. Hutcherson's right to his beliefs and opinions, but he does not speak for Microsoft, and he certainly does not set Microsoft's legislative agenda," said Mark Murray, a company spokesman. "We're proud of our antidiscrimination policies and benefits for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender employees, and we are committed to diversity at every level of our company."

Microsoft officials said they were re-evaluating their legislative priorities and had decided to take a "neutral" stance on the bill long before a high-level company official met twice with Dr. Hutcherson over his concerns that the company was going to support it.

In a style that is typically blunt (and, his detractors say, typically intimidating), Dr. Hutcherson described Microsoft's version of the events as "a flat-out lie."

Asked if he thought that he alone could have changed the giant corporation's mind, Dr. Hutcherson said in an interview Friday: "I don't think. I know."

He continued: "If I got God on my side, what's a Microsoft? What's a Microsoft? It's nothing."

If there is any question about Dr. Hutcherson's intolerance of dissent or disobedience - one that is infused with a stinging sense of humor - it could be answered quickly by a glance at the mini-refrigerator in his office. Next to his chair, which is submerged under a lavish white sheepskin cover, a sign on the fridge says, "Warning: I have licked the tops of all my Snapples - Hutch. * And I have tested positive for anthrax."

He is close to some of the nation's best-known Christian conservatives, including Dr. James C. Dobson, chairman of Focus on the Family, whom he calls "Dr. D," and over the last year he has organized rallies in Seattle and Washington, D.C., drawing tens of thousands of opponents of same-sex marriage.

There is little doubt, from hearing Dr. Hutcherson tell it, that he believes not only in the power of God, but also in the power of "Hutch," especially when it comes to going up against companies like Microsoft - or anyone else, for that matter.

"God plus Hutch is enough," said the minister, who stands 6 feet 2 inches, weighs 260 pounds and has a shaved head and a thick goatee streaked with a splash of white.

He added: "I want to be to Christianity what Gretzky was to hockey, what Beckham is to soccer, what Jordan was to basketball, what Martin Luther King was to African-American rights, what the Pope was to Poland. I want to be that to Christianity."

By trusting God, he said, he hopes for "great things" and "that I will be the most feared man in America, not because of me, but because of who I got on my side."

As even some of the church members say, there is good reason to fear Dr. Hutcherson. The church's motto is "black and white in a gray world."

On Sunday mornings, a half-dozen trailers pull up to Lake Washington High School in nearby Kirkland, filled with risers, microphones and other equipment, turning a school parking lot into what looks like a staging area for a rock concert. Antioch, which has offices but not its own church building, holds its rollicking, multimedia Sunday services at the school's gymnasium.

Dr. Hutcherson is known for publicly chastising and excommunicating members if he finds out they are sinning, calling adulterers, for example, up to the pulpit and demanding they repent, congregants said.

"And if they don't want to repent of it, he'll let them know that this is not the church for you," said John Stachofsky, 42, a longtime friend of Dr. Hutcherson and a member of the church who goes bird and deer hunting with him.

Many African-American ministers and conservative Christians share Dr. Hutcherson's opposition to same-sex marriage, which he calls "the greatest danger to America." But Dr. Hutcherson also often criticizes gay rights activists for drawing comparisons between their quest for equal rights and antidiscrimination laws and the struggles of other groups facing prejudice.

"You tell me what I went through as an African-American, when they talk about discrimination, compared to what gays go through with discrimination - it's the difference between night and day, not even close," Dr. Hutcherson said. "I even get upset when people say, 'Well, you got to understand what they go through.' Not when they've chosen to do what they do. They can stop choosing what to do what they do, and they can hide it anytime they want. They can hide their homosexuality. Could I take a 'don't ask don't tell' policy as an African-American? I could try even to pretend I was Puerto Rican, but I'm still going to get blasted for my skin color."

Dr. Hutcherson's views have earned him a fast-growing stable of enemies and critics.

"He came across as a bully, somebody who was threatening people, someone who was using the Scriptures, not for love but for hate," said Ed Murray, an openly gay state legislator from Seattle, a practicing Roman Catholic and a sponsor of the antidiscrimination bill.

Mr. Murray said he heard Dr. Hutcherson testify at a House hearing against the bill last February. Two Microsoft employees testified on behalf of the bill, prompting Dr. Hutcherson to demand the two meetings with Microsoft and to threaten the boycott. Microsoft officials have said the employees were testifying as private individuals, not on behalf of the company.

"I think he didn't so much as change Microsoft's mind as he caught them off guard," said Mr. Murray, who has also said that Microsoft officials told him Dr. Hutcherson had a role in their decision not to support the bill this year. "I think he was successful in throwing a ball at them and that they fumbled."

Ron Sims, the King County executive, has been a target of Dr. Hutcherson's protests because of his support for gay marriage. Mr. Sims, who is black, said he strongly disagreed with the minister on the civil rights question.

"I don't think that civil rights is the province of any particular group," said Mr. Sims, who earlier this year publicly invited six same-sex couples to sue him for the right to marry in King County, a case that is now being decided by the State Supreme Court and could determine whether gay men and lesbians can marry in Washington state.

"African-American homophobia is just another form of discrimination," he said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; hutcherson; kenhutcherson; marriage; megachurch; msn; pastor; seattle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: anniegetyourgun
Well, I suppose if sexually torturing infants to get Table 34 results could be considered "respected" methodology.

Without defending Kinsey because I really don't have a dog in this race, Kinsey was a pioneer in the field when he first published in 1948.

Dr. Reisman's recent work, like all scientific studies, is based upon all that came before so I would expect a refinement, or perhaps even a refutation, of previous studies that were based upon no prior data or study.

This should in no way diminish Kinsey's efforts because this represents the scientific method at its finest.

21 posted on 05/02/2005 4:25:02 AM PDT by infocats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: infocats
According to Kinsey, homosexuals may represent around 10% of the population but this is not (no pun intended) a hard and fast number.

Kinsey's number is fake.

It is well-documented that his surveys were (1) based on only a few hundred people (hence his sample size was too small to be statistically significant), (2) based on a sample of prison inmates (hence his sample was preselected by him and therefore statistically useless) and (3) based only on the answers of those who chose to respond (hence his sample was further self-selected by respondents and therefore statistically useless).

Kinsey was not only a terrible person, but he was also a terrible excuse for a scientist.

22 posted on 05/02/2005 4:29:11 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: infocats
This should in no way diminish Kinsey's efforts because this represents the scientific method at its finest.

Kinsey's method was the opposite of scientific.

His methods were completely counter to all standards of statistically sampling in 1948 and today.

Kinsey was a fake.

A charlatan.

A fraud.

23 posted on 05/02/2005 4:31:09 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: infocats

>>>>There has been some recent indication that general acceptance (and perhaps even the practice thereof) is dramatically on the increase among the young. <<<<<

Which proves that Homo's arent born that way, they can and are being recruited and trained .

Catch a kid when he or she is young and give him or her an orgasm and he or she will try for the next one. If that orgasm came form a fruit you have a potential queer for life. Also every male homosexual is a pedophile in spite of their denial. You dont see Homosexuals going to gay bars to pick up older men. You dont see older men prsotituting, you see kids.


24 posted on 05/02/2005 4:37:27 AM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: infocats
Finest? Using huge percentages of subjects out of the prison population (most of them known pedophiles, per testimony of his own research assistants) represents excellent scientific method? Even setting Kinsey's own abusive and weird sexual predilections aside, I'm just not buying it.

See 1998 BBC documentary: Secret History for the very disturbing story of this sicko.

""Kinsey elevated to... the realm of scientific information... what should have been dismissed as unreliable, self-serving data provided by a predatory pedophile... I don't have any doubt in my own mind that man wreaked havoc in a lot of lives. Many of his victims were infants and Kinsey in that chapter himself gives pretty graphic descriptions of their response to what he calls sexual stimulation. If you read those words, what he's talking about is kids who are screaming. Kids are protesting in every way they can the fact that their bodies or their persons are being violated." - James Jones, pro-Kinsey biographer.

25 posted on 05/02/2005 4:37:27 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: infocats; hellinahandcart
said Ed Murray, an openly gay state legislator from Seattle, a practicing Roman Catholic

There's a non-sequitor.

26 posted on 05/02/2005 4:41:53 AM PDT by sauropod (De gustibus non est disputandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

So true. Murray is a flaming homosexual with a seriously mean streak. Both are choices in behavior....and bad ones, at that.


27 posted on 05/02/2005 4:43:57 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: infocats

Kinsey was a fake phony fraud!

Check out Judy Reisman's book on the subject.


28 posted on 05/02/2005 4:44:36 AM PDT by sauropod (De gustibus non est disputandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Many of his victims were infants and Kinsey in that chapter himself gives pretty graphic descriptions of their response to what he calls sexual stimulation. If you read those words, what he's talking about is kids who are screaming. Kids are protesting in every way they can the fact that their bodies or their persons are being violated." - James Jones, pro-Kinsey biographer.

Without meaning to open up old wounds, this sounds suspiciously like Terry Schiavo's family and supporters who insisted that she was sensate and in communication with them.

Denial is a really potent force in our lives and should not ever be underestimated.

29 posted on 05/02/2005 4:44:51 AM PDT by infocats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

Yep.


30 posted on 05/02/2005 4:45:07 AM PDT by sauropod (De gustibus non est disputandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: infocats

Go, Hutch!!!


31 posted on 05/02/2005 4:45:56 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infocats

Why do you refuse to look at the truth?


32 posted on 05/02/2005 4:47:30 AM PDT by sauropod (De gustibus non est disputandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Which, "befuddles" me even more. Why is this even a topic of discussion. I'm sure mankind has been inundated with alternative sexual behavior from the beginning of time. Why is it the MSM desire to make this a societal issue at this moment in history. Why suddenly, do they feel "discriminated"? Hell, I feel discriminated!
33 posted on 05/02/2005 4:47:46 AM PDT by poobear ("Stategery Bushism")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: baystaterebel

Point A torments them most of all.


34 posted on 05/02/2005 4:49:30 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: infocats
Insanity. If we (heterosexuals) put up some kind of stink in an activist march of our chosen lifestyles, we would be arrested! This world is coming off it's rocker!
35 posted on 05/02/2005 4:51:01 AM PDT by poobear ("Stategery Bushism")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: infocats

It wasn't hard to figure out the tone of the piece or the author's agenda when the words "Rush Limbaugh" and "rottweilers" were stated in the second sentence.


36 posted on 05/02/2005 4:55:00 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Shut up Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infocats
[Microsoft]"We're proud of our antidiscrimination policies and benefits for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender employees,

Lovely. Will Microsoft be there to repair the shattered lives of children raised by homosexuals? < /rhetorical question>

37 posted on 05/02/2005 4:55:54 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poobear
why is this marriage right being shoved down the majority's throat?

Ultimately, this attack on the family is satanic. Why? For two main reasons. The family is the bedrock of civilization. All citizens pass through the institution of the family. As the family goes, so goes society. Secondly, the family represents the image of the Trinity. The love of husband and wife, which begets a child, images the love of Father for Son, from which proceeds the Holy Spirit. An attack on the family is an attack on the earthly image of the Trinity.

38 posted on 05/02/2005 5:00:10 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

Comment #40 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson