Without defending Kinsey because I really don't have a dog in this race, Kinsey was a pioneer in the field when he first published in 1948.
Dr. Reisman's recent work, like all scientific studies, is based upon all that came before so I would expect a refinement, or perhaps even a refutation, of previous studies that were based upon no prior data or study.
This should in no way diminish Kinsey's efforts because this represents the scientific method at its finest.
Kinsey's method was the opposite of scientific.
His methods were completely counter to all standards of statistically sampling in 1948 and today.
Kinsey was a fake.
A charlatan.
A fraud.
See 1998 BBC documentary: Secret History for the very disturbing story of this sicko.
""Kinsey elevated to... the realm of scientific information... what should have been dismissed as unreliable, self-serving data provided by a predatory pedophile... I don't have any doubt in my own mind that man wreaked havoc in a lot of lives. Many of his victims were infants and Kinsey in that chapter himself gives pretty graphic descriptions of their response to what he calls sexual stimulation. If you read those words, what he's talking about is kids who are screaming. Kids are protesting in every way they can the fact that their bodies or their persons are being violated." - James Jones, pro-Kinsey biographer.