To: wagglebee
In a stunning admission, the Washington Post said Sunday that President Bush's decision to go to war in Iraq deserves at least some of the credit for the fact that terrorists have not been able to launch another 9/11-style strike against America.
"A broad cross section of counterterrorism officials believes al Qaeda and like-minded groups, in part frustrated by increased U.S. security measures, are focusing instead on Americans deployed in Iraq," the paper said, "where the groups operate with relative impunity." Bush administration officials have long argued that taking the war to the terrorists' doorstep was the best way of drawing fire away from the homeland, while "draining the swamp" of global terrorism's most notorious players.So I wonder how the CROW tastes over at the Wash Post? Stringy and tough I hope.
2 posted on
05/01/2005 12:59:17 PM PDT by
AZHua87
(Insurgent BloggerVet!)
To: AZHua87
It's all Bush's fault. {:-)
4 posted on
05/01/2005 1:02:09 PM PDT by
EBH
To: AZHua87
"So I wonder how the CROW tastes over at the Wash Post? Stringy and tough I hope. "
hehe
with lots of Hienz Ketchup!
hehehe
22 posted on
05/01/2005 3:39:44 PM PDT by
e5man_r_u?
(A Man's mission: Build, Protect, Provide)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson