Skip to comments.
How the Left Co-opted the Medical Sciences (and create huge Public Health disasters)
AttacReport.com ^
| Bryan Ellison
Posted on 05/01/2005 11:25:22 AM PDT by TapTheSource
The intro is worth listening to, but not strictly necessary. Each audio file speaks for itself.
(Excerpt) Read more at attacreport.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: aids; beriberi; cary; conservativeissue; gaydisease; grid; health; healthcare; historyofscience; hiv; homosexualagenda; pellagra; policyreview; publichealth; robertgallo; scientificdisasters; scurvy; smon; socializedmedicine; talkradio; theleft; virushunters
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Optimist; weikel; Binyamin; ...
To: TapTheSource
3
posted on
05/01/2005 11:29:00 AM PDT
by
meema
To: meema
Also see the following Policy Review (Hoover Inst.) for a layman's article on the controversy. Indeed, I recommend exploring the entire website, especially the "Brief History" page.
Is The AIDS Virus A Science Fiction?: Immunosuppressive Behavior, Not HIV, May Be the Cause of AIDS
By Peter H. Duesberg & Bryan J. Ellison
Policy Review Summer 1990
http://www.duesberg.com/about/pdpolicy.html
To: TapTheSource
Pardon my ignorance, but who are "Amalek's Terrorists, Traitors, and Collaborators"?
To: non-anonymous
The author/speaker is Jewish. The nation of Amalek is the ancient enemy of the Jews. Many Jews equate the Nazis and Communists as modern manifestations of this malevolent force. If you are a Christian, all you have to is substitute the word 'Satan' or 'Satanic' for the word Amalek and you will begin to understand how many Jews interpret this word--TTS
To: TapTheSource
It's been 15 years since the publication of this paper; is there a follow-up paper ? It seems like they's know so much more now.
7
posted on
05/01/2005 12:06:06 PM PDT
by
cinives
(On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
To: cinives
To: cinives
PS Basic premise of above site is the same, but they do show how the facts continue to support the "risk-AIDS" hypothesis, as opposed to the (someday) defunct "HIV-AIDS" hypothesis.
To: cinives
Might also want to check out the signatories on the following group (link below):
The Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis came into existence as a group of signatories of an open letter to the scientific community. The letter (dated June 6, 1991) has been submitted to the editors of Nature, Science, The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine. All have refused to publish it. In 1995 The Group was able to get a letter published in Science.
You can also sign the statement below online.
To the editor:
It is widely believed by the general public that a retrovirus called HIV causes the group diseases called AIDS. Many biochemical scientists now question this hypothesis. We propose that a thorough reappraisal of the existing evidence for and against this hypothesis be conducted by a suitable independent group. We further propose that critical epidemiological studies be devised and undertaken.
Link:
http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/group.htm
To: TapTheSource
Thanks, appreciate the info.
11
posted on
05/01/2005 12:24:01 PM PDT
by
cinives
(On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
To: cinives
To: TapTheSource
13
posted on
05/02/2005 12:39:03 PM PDT
by
meema
To: little jeremiah; scripter
14
posted on
05/02/2005 1:23:37 PM PDT
by
EdReform
(Free Republic - helping to keep our country a free republic. Thank you for your financial support!)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson