Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unmentioned Energy Fix: A 55 M.P.H. Speed Limit
The New York Times ^ | May 1, 2005 | Jad Mouawad and Simon Romero

Posted on 05/01/2005 6:19:00 AM PDT by MississippiMasterpiece

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-285 next last
To: cripplecreek
In older pre-overdrive equipped vehicles it did... The higher the speed on older cars, the substantially higher the RPMs are, and usually much over 2500 RPM would open the 4bbl on a carbureted car (what all the cars from the period of the fuel crisis were), which is when fuel mileage goes totally in the toilet. Overdrive will raise that threshold at highway speeds to well over 3000 RPM, but without overdrive, it would start to suck down gas really fast...

Nowadays, many cars get their higher fuel efficency at higher speeds. For comparison, my od equipped 83 Cutlass Supreme gets 22 mpg on the highway from 68 mph up to about 85 mph, above that it drops to 18-20 mpg. My 96 Ciera SL gets 26 mpg on the highway, and does its best mileage between 75 and 90 mph, below 75 it stays around 23 mpg on the highway.

I guarantee that your truck would have a lot lower mileage wtihout that overdrive gear--probably gets 16-18 mpg now, would get 12-14 mpg otherwise.

The biggest increase in the cost of fuel for filling up a truck or SUV, is not as much an actual increase as percieved. In the 70s and 80s, trucks had 14-16 gallon tanks. Now trucks and SUVs usually have 30-40 gallon tanks (and their mileage has indeed improved some because I know older trucks usually got 10-12 mpg at best). They have much longer cruising range, but they cost more to fuel up (regardless of the fuel price) because of holding more fuel.

241 posted on 05/01/2005 6:06:17 PM PDT by Schwaeky (Attention Liberal Catholics---The Caffeteria is officially and permanently CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

I was just thinking about this...

I may try an experiment the next time I drive from KC to OKC. I think that I'll try going 70MPH one way, and 55MPH the other way.

At about 70MPH, it takes me right about 5.5 hrs to make the drive. At 55, I estimate that it will take a bit more than 7 hours to make the same trip.

What I've been wondering about is exactly how they've calculated the difference in milage. I know that as speed increases, the power required goes up exponentially. But given the efficiency of todays engines, I wonder if that really matters as much...

Again, what I've wondered is how they come up with the "savings." Do they actually drive a fixed distance, and then note the amount of gasoline required at each speed, or do they drive for a fixed amount of time, and then compute the amount of fuel used...

I'll have to give it a try. I'm just wondering if the extra hour and a half the drive will take me will really save me any gasoline (I get roughly 34 - 37 mpg normally in my 2000 Toyota Corolla).

Mark


242 posted on 05/01/2005 6:08:26 PM PDT by MarkL (I've got a fever, and the only prescription is MORE COWBELL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Re your #186:

I run an old '91 Plymouth Voyager with 137K on the clock, and it still runs like a top.

And I typically run about 45 PSI in the front tires, since most of the weight of the vehicle is on them.

It seems to handle better, and the tread does not wear out on the outside as much as it will when I run the reccomended 35 PSI - which I do in the rears.

Now all of these theories are very interesting, and I don't claim to know that much about it; all I do know is that "Old Red" gets significantly better milage at around 60 MPH than it will at 70 - 75 which one pretty much has to maintain in order to keep up with traffic on the highways here in Maine. Old Red is perfectly capable of cruising at 80+, but it will cost me at the pumps if we do.

So lately, if I'm not in a particular hurry, I'll cruise around 65 - which is the posted speed limit.

Of course, everybody passes us as if we were parked, riding at anchor, or hitched to a tree.
And they seem none too pleased about old red and I getting in their way.

I'm considering making up a bumper sticker (duct tape and magic marker) to stick on the tailgate;

"Sorry if I'm in your way; When Gas is back < $2 a gallon, I'll speed back up".

As for Diesel; I love it. Our 27' Class C Motor home has a big 450 CI V-8 Deisel with automatic electric overdrive, and it's great. But Deisel is running around $2.50 a gallon up this way (gas is down to $2.19), which hardly makes it an economical alternative!

I'm hoping that this "Biodeisel" made out of cooking fat and vegetable oil will become economically competitive, so we'll at least have something to run on! Apparently it creates much less air pollution and smells a lot better than your regular bus - breath.


243 posted on 05/01/2005 6:08:55 PM PDT by Uncle Jaque (Vigilance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

What is the difference between doing 85 mph in a 70 mph zone and doing 85 in a 55 mph zone on I10 between Houston and San Antonio? The size of the ticket.


244 posted on 05/01/2005 6:09:33 PM PDT by TXBSAFH (Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, who's bringing the chips?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scouse; MississippiMasterpiece; Samwise; JCEccles; Ditto; Travis McGee; longtermmemmory
Of course it has, it was instigated during the Jimmy Carter era,

No, it started back in the Nixon administration back in the spring of 1974. It wasn't till the summer of 1986 that a partial repeal was approved by Congress. I still can't figure out why it wasn't repealed in 1981. The total repeal occurred in 1995 after Republicans swept congressional elections in 1994.

245 posted on 05/01/2005 6:13:32 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

It's been tried and collectively laughed at by American motorists.


246 posted on 05/01/2005 6:14:13 PM PDT by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah
Anyone advocating adding taxes to gas should be shot and leave this world forever. That is not an answer. The 55 mph speed limit may be a decent idea if we start hitting $75 for a barrel of oil. But we need need an energy plan now.

More importantly, what they don't seem to understand is that when the cost of fuel goes up, so does the cost of everything else. And aren't these usually the same people who cry about needing to increase the minimum wage? If these people were in charge, gasoline would be $10 a gallon, and the minimum wage would be $20 an hour, just to keep up with the increased food (and everything else) prices!

Mark

247 posted on 05/01/2005 6:14:16 PM PDT by MarkL (I've got a fever, and the only prescription is MORE COWBELL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Nov3

You have to be going 88mph to activate the flux capacitor.


248 posted on 05/01/2005 6:25:15 PM PDT by Schwaeky (Attention Liberal Catholics---The Caffeteria is officially and permanently CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: billbears
I still can't figure out why it wasn't repealed in 1981.

Oh I can....

Dole Undermines Reagan by Supporting the 55-Mile Per Hour Speed Limit

When candidate Reagan campaigned in favor of abolishing the 55-mile per hour speed limit, it was Dole who fought to maintain it. As James Bovard writes:

"As Transportation Secretary, Dole consistently sought to maximize federal power both over citizens and state governments…as Transportation Secretary Dole fought all attempts to allow states to raise speed limits. Dole was the first Secretary of Transportation to penalize state governments for failure to ticket enough speeding drivers….After Dole cut highway funding to several states, Congress moved to end the 55 mph speed limit." (3)

Dole billed herself as the "Secretary of Safety" and sided with Ralph Nader and other liberals in maintaining that lifting the 55 miles-per-hour rule would be disastrous. Dole even had DOT letterhead printed up with the "55 Speed Limit" logo on the bottom, (4) Ironically, the reality was that after Congress authorized states to raise the 55-mile-per-hour limit to 65, our highways became safer. Economists Charles Lave and Patrick Elias examined the statistics before and after the 55-mile-per-hour law and concluded:

"The fatality rate dropped by 3.4% -5.1% following the speed limit increase in states with higher speed limits." (5)

Furthermore, numerous other studies by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, the California Department of Transportation and even data from Dole’s own Department of Transportation have confirmed the folly of Dole’s position on this issue. (6) Only when it became obvious that the 55 mph limits would be lifted did Dole climb on board, and even then in a limited fashion. (7) Ironically, Dole’s efforts to save us from ourselves by fighting to delay raising the speed limit likely led to hundreds of additional auto accident fatalities.

Brewer Dole Report

And this woman is my current 'conservative' representation in Congress. And I can't tell you how thankful I am for that every day...

249 posted on 05/01/2005 6:27:18 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: All

55 mph on the interstate? Like hell.


250 posted on 05/01/2005 6:27:35 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Post #249 is in response to your question for why it was not repealed in '81


251 posted on 05/01/2005 6:28:02 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: beaelysium

read this


252 posted on 05/01/2005 6:29:06 PM PDT by beaelysium (Paradise is always where love dwells.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Nov3; cripplecreek
I don't want to get into anything here but I'm going to have to agree with cripplecreek on this. Experience with two different Mustangs, both stick, minor modifications to the engine on one, major mods to the other. My gas mileage did average approx 3-5 mpg better around 70-75 than it did at 55.
253 posted on 05/01/2005 6:32:12 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222

Interesting picture but I believe it was taken during the 1973 Energy crisis.


254 posted on 05/01/2005 6:33:23 PM PDT by jsbankston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
The easiest way to make fairly good measurements is to have a test vehicle where the speed is calibrated and the injector fuel flows vs. pulsewidth are well known. Then one only has to set the cruse control on level ground with little to no wind and look at the injector pulse widths and vehicle speed for a few seconds once at constant speed at various speeds. To do this at home takes a constant driving cycle and and ability to repeatedly fill the gas tank to the same level every time (note that gas has a thermal expansion coefficient so one would like to fill at the same ambient temperature at the same gas station pump just before starting or ending the trip. Including both directions at the same speed (making two complete runs (or more)) might help control more variables. Testing cost money. Running equations on your computer is cheaper. ;-)

The real world is what really matters for a given driver/vehicle, so you're on your own to figure exactly what to compare. For new vehicles, fuel costs are a relatively small fraction of total operating costs so it's more of a philosophical/emotional issue as long as fuel is available.

255 posted on 05/01/2005 6:34:36 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Don't Tread on Me; Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: billbears
When candidate Reagan campaigned in favor of abolishing the 55-mile per hour speed limit, it was Dole who fought to maintain it. As James Bovard writes:

Elizabeth Dole wasn't Secretary of Transportation till 1989 under the George H W Bush administration. This would explain why she opposed total elimination of the restrictions that still existed after 1986, but not why Congress didn't repeal them entirely back in 1981 when the Reagan adminstration came to office with a senate majority and good strength in the house. It may have been that with oil prices high and shortages of oil, it was not an opportune time to repeal speed limits. By 1986, oil had gone down to under $10 per barrel and there was a huge amount of oil available around the world.

256 posted on 05/01/2005 6:36:45 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: 19th LA Inf

Not totally correct. First generation 350 ci diesel Olds V8 (all the first diesels for cars and light trucks were built for GM by Oldsmobile) with the D casting were junk from the factory, mostly due to crankshaft clearance issues and woefully inadequate head gaskets (aftermarket bearing kits and aftermarket headgaskets solved these two problems, with these motors logging 300-400+ k and getting 28-30 mpg w/o o/d. By 1981, the DX casting motors came out, with greatly improved cooling and durability. The D block was a retrofit on an existing gas casting, and had the problems of the windowed main block, but the DX block was solid mains which raised the weight by about 50 lbs, but raised durability through the roof.


257 posted on 05/01/2005 6:37:09 PM PDT by Schwaeky (Attention Liberal Catholics---The Caffeteria is officially and permanently CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
55 mph on the interstate? Like hell.

And Texas is proposing 85 mph on the Trans-Texas Corridor.

258 posted on 05/01/2005 6:37:37 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Sorry but no. From her Senatorial page.

Elizabeth Dole’s resume includes six years (1973-1979) as a member of the Federal Trade Commission and two years (1981-1983) as Assistant to President Reagan for Public Liaison.

In February 1983, Elizabeth Dole joined President Reagan’s Cabinet as Secretary of Transportation – the first woman to hold that position. During her four-and-a-half years at Transportation, the United States enjoyed the safest period then to date in all three major transportation areas – rail, air, and highway.

259 posted on 05/01/2005 6:41:18 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

She was Secretary of Labor under Bush I. Remember those OSHA regulations everyone raised a ruckus about right before Clinton pushed through as a last gasp? I'll give you one guess who started that mess.


260 posted on 05/01/2005 6:43:31 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-285 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson