Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

March of Dimes Exposé (Warning: Graphic Content)
Catholic Exchange ^ | April 30, 2005 | PA Pro-Life Federation

Posted on 04/30/2005 5:41:34 AM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 04/30/2005 5:41:35 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; ...
Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


2 posted on 04/30/2005 5:44:36 AM PDT by NYer ("Love without truth is blind; Truth without love is empty." - Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus; Mr. Silverback; cpforlife.org

Insidious! One more charity's true identity revealed.


3 posted on 04/30/2005 5:46:01 AM PDT by NYer ("Love without truth is blind; Truth without love is empty." - Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Thank you for this information. I didn't know this about the March of Dimes.

Goes to show we must be careful of where we give to charity.


4 posted on 04/30/2005 5:48:47 AM PDT by ViLaLuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

I've known they're dirty for years. I walked out of a bank that I was thinking of starting an account with, when I saw their sponsorship of the MOD.

There oughtta be a "march of quarters" (or maybe march of nickels) to out them.


5 posted on 04/30/2005 5:57:15 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Because Down's Syndrome babies are often among those innocent babies killed by abortion, the Michael Fund places special emphasis on Down's Syndrome research. Columnist Rich Hinshaw says, "It is one of the triumphs of modern society that the life of the average person with Down's Syndrome has become strikingly normal — except that, unlike normal people, people with Down's Syndrome have been targeted for elimination."

My Daughter was born with Downs. She's lovely. What kind of monster would want to kill this precious person? A liberal one, I guess.


6 posted on 04/30/2005 6:03:50 AM PDT by Neever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz
Thank you for this information. I didn't know this about the March of Dimes.

You're welcome! Didn't know it either. 50 years ago, my grandmother walked the neighborhood collecting for this organization. Back then, the dimes collected were used to benefit victims of polio and other crippling diseases. Seems this charity, and many others, have chosen to 'eliminate' these illnesses through nefarious means.

UNICEF is another one.

7 posted on 04/30/2005 6:06:09 AM PDT by NYer ("Love without truth is blind; Truth without love is empty." - Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Neever
My Daughter was born with Downs. She's lovely.

Down's children are such blessings in this world. They are filled with simple joy and willingly share it with others. Only a demon would want to deny the world of their precious gift.

Bless you and your daughter!

8 posted on 04/30/2005 6:20:13 AM PDT by NYer ("Love without truth is blind; Truth without love is empty." - Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Along with the intended consequences of abortion, the diminution of the respect for life, the unintended consequences of depleting the pool of those capable of paying for all the liberal programs have raised their heads. Perhaps I am wrong, though, since the destruction of our way of life is the goal of the left, this could have been intended.


9 posted on 04/30/2005 6:37:30 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not everything that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz
The book states the March of Dimes' viewpoint that, "There is no substitution for a constitutional right to abortion which protects our fundamental rights . . .

Another of our fundamental rights is to hold on to our wallets and deposit the March of Dimes appeal in the round file.

10 posted on 04/30/2005 6:39:57 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (crime would drop like a sprung trapdoor if we brought back good old-fashioned hangings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I've known this about MODs for a number of years, but not many do, so keep spreading the word!

I've used Charity Navigator in the past to screen unsolicited charities that have contacted me. It's a good tool.

Now I just donate through my church for causes, or to my local food pantry and shelter; I think I do more good keeping my dollars Local versus National.

http://www.charitynavigator.org/


11 posted on 04/30/2005 6:44:15 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz
I began telling people about the March of Dimes back in the '70's.

By the '80's, in San Antonio, TX, I greeted their walkers with homemade pamphlets about how they sponsored amniocentesis to find "potential birth defects."

On another occasion, my step-son joined me holding signs for one of their walks. My sign had a picture of a late-term aborted baby asking "Will your money be used for this?" a few yards behind me, my step-sons sign explained, "The March of Dimes provides testing so that handicapped babies can be found and aborted before they are born."

Most people glared at me. One person loudly told me "No!" Only to be corrected by a co-walker. A man passing by my sign said, "I hope so."

But one woman, when she passed by stopped, stunned as she read the sign my son was holding.

12 posted on 04/30/2005 7:06:58 AM PDT by eccentric (a.k.a. baldwidow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer; little jeremiah
In 1973-74, MOD gave $9,420 for appallingly grotesque fetal brain metabolism studies in Helsinki, Finland on living, human babies aborted by hysterotomy and still attached by the umbilical cord to the mother. The babies were then decapitated and their heads were mounted on perfusion equipment. Arthur A. Galloway, MOD Vice President for Development, defended this research, saying it was "done legally and ethically" under Finnish law; that "the investigators did not participate in the decision to terminate pregnancy;" and "they were concerned with the ethics of discarding such fetal issue without seeking to find ways to improve the life and health of live-born premature infants."

Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!!!

I knew they were promoting abortion for years now, but I never heard about this before. Appalling grotesque is right, and may they repent before they die. Arthur A. Galloway=Dr. Mengele.

13 posted on 04/30/2005 7:16:44 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (Free Mexico!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

bump


14 posted on 04/30/2005 7:20:47 AM PDT by lilmsdangrus (hard work musta hurt somebody, somewhere....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Unfortunately, many well-meaning pro-life citizens continue to support MOD

Like Patricia Heaton. Wake up Patty.


15 posted on 04/30/2005 8:26:44 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
I refuse to support charities which should have disbanded years ago when their cause was accomplished.

Am I the only one who remembers "March of Dimes against Polio"?

16 posted on 04/30/2005 8:29:52 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

Or "Censure Bill Clinton and MOVE ON" (that was their original "stated" purpose).


17 posted on 04/30/2005 8:31:41 AM PDT by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NYer
In a letter to Congress in 1978, MOD President Charles Massey wrote in favor of legislation to fund this genetic screening. Massey notes, "The financial cost of treating and institutionalizing our severely affected survivors is staggering; we cannot begin to measure the cost."

Just when is a human life too costly to be continued? Are our nursing home residents too costly? Are folks with incurable (but not necessarily terminal) illnesses too costly? Are disabled people, either physically or mentally, who require care or equipment above a totally healthy person too costly? We already know that inconvenient babies are too "costly" and we're not just talking money in this instance. It's a slippery slope and we're on it already and picking up speed. At the risk of showing my religious leanings, may God have mercy on our souls.

18 posted on 04/30/2005 8:38:46 AM PDT by MissMagnolia (Common sense is not so common)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer; Salvation; Mr. Silverback; cpforlife.org; Coleus

NYer -- Thank you for posting this.

My very pro-life wife mistakenly gave a small amount of money to the MOD last year, but we will never do so again. I have told her to tell the people in our neighborhood who make door-to-door solicitations for the MOD exactly why we are refusing to support them. Since we live in a very conservative part of the country, there is a strong likelihood that these people are also pro-life and that they will be suitably appalled. I hope that we will be able to deprive them of some support in the future.

BTW, do any of you know of a charity for people with neurological diseases (like ALS or MS) that does not support fetal stem-cell research? I would like to give money to such a charity. Thanks in advance for your help.


19 posted on 04/30/2005 9:48:46 AM PDT by bourbon (quasi morientes et ecce vivimus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer; All
MOD President Charles Massey notes, "The financial cost of treating and institutionalizing our severely affected survivors is staggering."

Excellent point, President Massey. But why stop with unborn children? Perhaps we could form a panel of experts - you would be a logical member - that would screen all members of society.

For those whose cost of treatment and/or institutionalization exceeds their marginal utility, we could perform what might be called a post-natal abortion. The savings could be tremendous.

20 posted on 04/30/2005 10:21:46 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson