Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Say Red Speck Is Indeed Huge New Planet
NY Times ^ | April 30, 2005 | DENNIS OVERBYE

Posted on 04/29/2005 10:22:03 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: Qwinn

Thanks! I wasn't too sure of that -- some Arthur C Clarke books are masterpieces -- like Rendezvous with Rama, but some others are real duds. I'm a big Asimov fan -- you>?


41 posted on 04/30/2005 2:33:16 AM PDT by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping. I may not alert the list over this. We've had quite a few threads on extra-solar planets lately.


42 posted on 04/30/2005 4:11:18 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

"The planet is about 1,350 trillion miles away from us."

Beam us up Scotty.


43 posted on 04/30/2005 5:24:29 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Qwinn
Or was Clarke taking extreme liberties with science for the sake of his story?

C'mon, if you want to know about real science, you shouldn't be reading science fiction stories. In fact, you shouldn't read articles about science topics in the MSM, or scientific magazines aimed at the general public (Discover, Omni, etc.). Stay away from scientific documentaries, as well. As sources of scientific information, they all suck. If you're just looking for entertainment, they're probably okay.

44 posted on 04/30/2005 5:52:38 AM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
..orbits a kind of failed star known as a brown dwarf at a distance of at least five billion miles, twice as far as icy Neptune is from our own Sun.

Colder than the coldest freezing ice cold cold you can imagine.

Put it in a freezer and it would melt.
45 posted on 04/30/2005 6:25:18 AM PDT by clyde asbury (I'm not playing hard to get. I am hard to get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qwinn

" How the heck can this planet be five times the mass of Jupiter and not start fusing it's lighter elements under it's own extreme gravitational pressure? "

The smallest true star known (with active fusion) has 100 times the mass of Jupiter.

Arthur Clarke's premise in turning Jupiter into a star was to artificially compress the matter to achieve a fusion process. It is not based on the natural mass and gravitational pressure in Jupiter, but a science fiction construct of an advanced civilization.


46 posted on 04/30/2005 6:33:36 AM PDT by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Qwinn

“Spectroscopic measurements show water vapor in its atmosphere, suggesting that it is cold like a planet and not hot like a star.”

 

“…..under it's own extreme gravitational pressure?”

 

With such a strong gravity, how could there be “water vapor in it’s” atmosphere”????


47 posted on 04/30/2005 7:07:52 AM PDT by Not a 60s Hippy (They are SOCIALISTS - not progressives, elitists, liberals, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; ...

48 posted on 04/30/2005 8:13:45 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I recently picked up a copy of Clarke's "Fountains of Paradise" just to read his description of a space elevator. What's funny and encouraging about the recent news on the development of a real space elevator is that Clarke has us in the mid 21st Century and already back on the Moon and established on Mars before a substance strong enough and light enough to support a space elevator is discovered.


49 posted on 04/30/2005 8:58:54 AM PDT by Neville72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Alright. How is gravitational pull exerted? How does that kind of attraction have an influence on another body billions of miles away?


50 posted on 04/30/2005 9:18:14 AM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS
Alright. How is gravitational pull exerted? How does that kind of attraction have an influence on another body billions of miles away?

Check Gravity after clicking on Mechanics at Hyperphysics.

51 posted on 04/30/2005 10:13:51 AM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Great resource, thanks!

Basically, I learned that it takes two bodies acting on each other for either object to react. That while acting upon one another, the bodies exchange massless particles, and the the force of gravity is acting along a line between the centers of the two masses.


52 posted on 04/30/2005 10:37:31 AM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS
Great resource, thanks!

I bookmarked it a while ago. As a refresher, I thought it was the best thing since sliced bread.

53 posted on 04/30/2005 11:15:53 AM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie; garbageseeker; Knitting A Conundrum
from 2005.

· X-Planets ping list · join · view topics · view or post blog messages · bookmark ·

54 posted on 08/19/2006 8:09:40 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edwin hubble; RadioAstronomer
The smallest true star known (with active fusion) has 100 times the mass of Jupiter.

I was going to say about 80 Jovian masses, but we're both in the same ball park. Basically, to be a naturally formed star whose energy is being supplied by ongoing fusion reactions, you need a minimum of about 0.1 solar masses. Brown dwarfs are what I like to call "stellar wannabes" who got "voted off the island" because they don't quite have the mass it takes to get the job done of initiating AND maintaining an ongoing fusion reaction.

55 posted on 08/19/2006 8:28:26 PM PDT by longshadow (FReeper #405, entering his ninth year of ignoring nitwits, nutcases, and recycled newbies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

ROTF!


56 posted on 08/19/2006 8:29:55 PM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson