[antiRepublicrat]

Good. One instance of Bush's passion for censorship overturned.

[Sunshine Sister]

Go away bottom feeder!

[Jackson57]

Good. One instance of Bush's passion for censorship overturned. That's an assine comment. As a person who's actually lost a family member in Iraq, I don't think it's YOUR or anyone else's business to see pictures of their coffins. You seem to think that respect for the privacy of the families is somehow censoring your right to see coffins. Hmmm, another instance of the "rights" of others superseding someone else's rights. How readily would you allow pictures of dead relative of yours plastered on the nightly news????

[Arpege92]

It's not censorship....it's called respect for the families of those who lost a loved one. Geez!

[armymarinemom]

These men and women gave enough. Most of the families disagree with this. The media has only paid attention to the few who have complained.

[swordfish71]

I know a 3 families that have lost sons in Iraq---they don't want the media crwling all over taking pictures of coffins. They can tell morive when they see it.

It isn't as if the media was trying to show any respect towards our honored dead----they have an agenda, pure and simple. The media could CARE LESS about them getting killed unless they can be USED for some low purpose.


My nephew lost his leg in Iraq---some media peke wanted to interview him to get his ideas on President Bush and the war in general. My nephew told him to go eff off.

The media puke couldn't understand it at all.

[ladyinred]

Good. One instance of Bush's passion for censorship overturned.

This policy is not from the Bush administration. Censorship you say? It is rather anti-explotation if anything.