Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gunrunner2
As stated previously, "close" has nothing to do with how close the jet is. Never did. . .ever.

And thus my comment on the B-2 and F-16 as not being built for that purpose. They never were...ever.

120 posted on 04/29/2005 1:14:52 PM PDT by N. Theknow (Planned Parenthood is neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: N. Theknow
The context of the remarks in post 118 were confusing and led me to think that the B-2 and F-16 were somehow not CAS. . .it was the question marks and the plumber remark that did me in.
122 posted on 04/29/2005 1:31:48 PM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: N. Theknow
Oh. . .and to be clear. . .the munitions make most platforms capable of performing CAS. Doesn't matter what the aircraft is; B-52, B-2 or F-16. . .they all have preformed or can perform CAS---and do it exceptionally well. it's all in the targeting and munition and command and control.

Just to be clear.
128 posted on 04/29/2005 8:12:20 PM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson