The tresspass is a red herring.
The principle simply refused a demand that a father be told about sexual material his CHILD was being exposed.
The principle did not want to deal with HUNDREDS of parental demands to not have their children exposed to homosexual material. Then the converse of GLSEN demanding children be taught homosexual sex.
If anything, this book will now become the litmus test, are other parents at the school going to send certified mail demand letters?
I bet the public schools will adopt a stigma system of putting an anti-homosexual material letter in the permanent file of all students. Anything to protect the sexual recruiting right of homosexuals at the expense of children.
Sometimes tresspassing is just tresspassing. There are proper ways to deal with this kind of thing. The laws aren't there just for people who don't agree with us. We feel we are above the law, watch what happens.