Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory
If the tresspass is a red herring why wasn't he ejected from the school earlier?

Sometimes tresspassing is just tresspassing. There are proper ways to deal with this kind of thing. The laws aren't there just for people who don't agree with us. We feel we are above the law, watch what happens.

25 posted on 04/28/2005 9:58:00 AM PDT by Darkwolf (Jean Shepherd audio: http://www.flicklives.com/Mass_Back/mass_back.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Darkwolf

GENERAL LAWS OF MASSACHUSETTS

PART I.
ADMINISTRATION OF THE GOVERNMENT

TITLE XII.
EDUCATION

CHAPTER 71. PUBLIC SCHOOLS


MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Chapter 71: Section 32A Sex education; policy regarding notice to parents, exception

  Section 32A. Every city, town, regional school district or vocational school district implementing or maintaining curriculum which primarily involves human sexual education or human sexuality issues shall adopt a policy ensuring parental/guardian notification. Such policy shall afford parents or guardians the flexibility to exempt their children from any portion of said curriculum through written notification to the school principal. No child so exempted shall be penalized by reason of such exemption.

  Said policy shall be in writing, formally adopted by the school committee as a school district policy and distributed by September first, nineteen hundred and ninety-seven, and each year thereafter to each principal in the district. A copy of each school district's policy must be sent to the department of education after adoption.

  To the extent practicable, program instruction materials for said curricula shall be made reasonably accessible to parents, guardians, educators, school administrators, and others for inspection and review.

  The department of education shall promulgate regulations for adjudicatory proceedings to resolve any and all disputes arising under this section.


Return to:

** Next Section ** Previous Section ** Chapter Table of Contents ** Legislative Home Page

26 posted on 04/28/2005 9:59:17 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf

Why did the principle refuse such a simple request? Does not Mass. have laws regarding parental consent to sex education?

Why are kindigardners being subjected to sex education?

Homosexuality is only about sex? About a man playing with another man's penis or a woman playing with another womans vagina. There is ZERO reason to expose todlers to such material.

What leg does the principle believe their were going to stand upon? if anything the principle guaranteed a lawsuit. Then again the principle might be a homosexual.


27 posted on 04/28/2005 10:01:10 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf

Dude, he had a scheduled appointment with the Principal to discuss his son, a student in that school. He can not have been tresspassing.


29 posted on 04/28/2005 10:09:43 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf
Aren't you a little new around here to be "waxing" so eloquently?

The public schools are out of control, lack educational excellence,spend too much money per student, and are graduating children that can barely function in a moralistic society.

You wouldn't happen to have close ties to the public school system would you? Inquiring minds...
34 posted on 04/28/2005 10:21:34 AM PDT by politicket (We now live in a society where "tolerance" is celebrated at the expense of moral correctness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson