[Mr. Mulliner]

This is the 2nd of two interviews about Harvard Law School in an article titled "Uncongeniality Contest." The first interview was with a Harvard Law professor named William Stuntz.

This stuff about Critical Legal Studies and "difficult conversations" is absolutely alarming and I hope more people wake up to what's going on at Harvard Law School soon.

[Mind-numbed Robot]

They seem to be openly and aggressively teaching Communism and preparing students to attack free enterprise. Unfortunately, Harvard is just one of many.

[tahiti]

"Harvard Law remains America's most famous law school, and because of this status, future lawyers seeking to make a difference cannot afford to shun the school.",

I predict and I think it has already begun, Harvard Law school status will diminish just the same as the MSM status as diminished, in the very near future.

You do not have to be a "Harvard Law" school graduate to make a difference in constitutonal law any longer.

Individuals do not even need a lawyer to properly and effectively argue for the protection of individual and property rights from violation by local, state, and federal legislators.

And individuals can file pro se law suits asking for judicial review of legislation that does violate their rights.

All you have to do is learn your rights and exert them, similar to what bloggers have done in news reporting and political commentary.

Thank God for the internet and forums such as FreeRepublic.com.

[pabianice]

Since Harvard lawyers reside among the 95th percentile of income earners in the US... what stinking hypocrits! They want to redistribute OTHER peoples' money, apparently...

[gaspar]

Those familiar with the activity of Cornell Law school would not be surprised that it is at the forefront of the Critical Legal Studies movment: http://www.law.cornell.edu/topics/critical_theory.html