1 posted on
04/27/2005 2:40:17 PM PDT by
fanfan
To: GMMAC; conniew; JudyinCanada; -YYZ-; backhoe; Grig; headsonpikes; West Coast Conservative; ...
GO STEPHEN!
PING
Please let me know if you want on or off the Adscam ping list
2 posted on
04/27/2005 2:41:29 PM PDT by
fanfan
(" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
To: All
Hey Everyone,
Meet our 'new' (soon to be) Prime Minister Stephen Harper....
![](http://a123.g.akamai.net/f/123/12465/1d/media.canada.com/cp/national/20050426/n0426106a.jpg)
3 posted on
04/27/2005 3:00:42 PM PDT by
fanfan
(" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
To: fanfan
To: fanfan
Harper vows to take down LiberalsCould she do that?
![](http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/regent/the_specials/valerie_harper/specialspre.jpg)
6 posted on
04/27/2005 3:08:58 PM PDT by
South40
(Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: fanfan
"Even with NDP support, the Liberal government's survival is uncertain.
The Liberals would need all their 131 votes, the NDP's 19, and possibly those of all three independents, allowing the Liberal Speaker to cast the deciding ballot to bring the tally to 154."
The margin for error in that calculation is zero.
Plus nobody has a clue what tricks Duceppe will pull.
May 4 is going to be very interesting indeed.
To: fanfan
The Canadian "Conservatives" are kinda like US Democrats not like US Conservatives.
For example, the Canuck Conservative party platform explicitly supports socialized medicine!
9 posted on
04/27/2005 4:09:39 PM PDT by
adam_az
(Support the Minute Man Project - http://www.minutemanproject.com/Donations.html)
To: fanfan
What a bunch of whores the NDP are for this. They hopefully will be punished by the voters. It IS time to take the Liberals down for what to me is the most important reason. To stop the National Daycare Program. For one, I resent my tax money being used to baby sit some one elses kids. My wife is a stay at home mom, but apparently she is not a productive member of society, so she will get squat from the government. Had she decided to abandon her children to strangers then she would be eligible to suck of the taxpayer teats. Secondly the program seeks to create government run daycares with union workers. Excuse me. Private daycare can come under regulatory scrutiny from government agencies. But who will scrutinize the government? We all know how well they regulate themselves. We will end up with a 100 billion dollar daycare program when its all said and done.
To: fanfan
I was up in Vancouver on Saturday. Saw a suprisingly large number of NPD buttons on walkers in Stanley Park, as well as signs in both English and Chinese for NPD candidates.
11 posted on
04/27/2005 4:25:02 PM PDT by
Clemenza
(I am NOT A NUMBER, I am a FREE MAN!!!)
To: fanfan
One of the independents is a conservative from British Columbia. The Bloc is enraged and the Conservatives are upset with the NDP's Comrade Layton going behind their backs to craft a deal with the Liberals to take out tax cuts and pour the money into social programs. My guess is if the Bloc votes
non and the Conservatives vote "no" and the conservative independent votes with them, the Government will fall and Canada is headed once again to the polls, possibly as soon as June.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
21 posted on
04/27/2005 7:07:53 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: fanfan
Encouraging news from our FD/FRiends
in the Great White North! Oh Canada!
62 posted on
05/02/2005 10:46:48 AM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(If you must filibuster, let the Constitution do the talkin')
To: fanfan
95 posted on
05/06/2005 11:05:38 AM PDT by
ConservativeMan55
(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson