LOL
We need a bigger BBQ!
Posted on 04/27/2005 2:40:11 PM PDT by fanfan
Harper vows to take down Liberals
AMHERSTBURG, Ont. -- Conservative Party Leader Stephen Harper vowed Wednesday to topple the fragile Liberal government "at the earliest opportunity" as he fumed about Paul Martin's "deal with the devil" -- a $4.6-billion budget agreement with the New Democrats.
Harper called Martin's willingness to accede to the NDP's demand to remove billions of dollars in corporate tax cuts from the federal budget the "most disgraceful thing" he'd ever seen as he tried to pin the blame for a snap election on the Liberal-NDP alliance.
"The prime minister went so far as to say that this arrangement in this particular episode shows that this Parliament works," Harper said during a luncheon speech in Amherstburg, a short drive south of Windsor, Ont.
"This is not how Parliament should work. As soon as we get back, I will be asking our caucus to put this government out of its misery at the earliest possible opportunity."
That could be as early as May 4, according to Conservative insiders who say that's the earliest date that a no-confidence motion that's currently before the public works committee could be brought before the House of Commons for a vote.
At an earlier stop in Ridgetown, Ont., Harper said the "fiscally irresponsible" deal to delay corporate tax cuts and siphon the $4.6-billion proceeds into social programs over the next two years was a sign the government is "seriously off the rails."
Harper said it would be impossible for Conservatives to support the budget, which favours NDP priorities and props up a government teetering on the brink of collapse from explosive allegations emerging daily from the Gomery inquiry into the federal sponsorship scandal.
In exchange for the changes to the budget, Layton has agreed to support the government in its effort to get the budget passed and in any no-confidence motions the Liberals face before the budget bill receives royal assent.
"We already have enough problems with Liberal corruption," Harper said. "Having an NDP budget is not going to make us support Liberal corruption."
But in an interview Wednesday with The Canadian Press, Martin said he intends to use a separate piece of legislation to push ahead with the tax cuts that were excised from the budget, provided the Conservatives are willing to support the move.
Planned cuts for small- and medium-sized businesses remain intact under the agreement, which calls for $4.6 billion in new investment over two years for the environment, affordable housing, foreign aid, and post-secondary education and training.
Speaking in Montreal, Bloc Quebecois Leader Gilles Duceppe also slammed the proposed budget changes and said he doesn't intend to support them.
"What's good for Quebec, we'll support," Duceppe said. "What's bad for Quebec, we'll oppose. The Layton-Martin agreement is not good for Quebec. It's not a good budget for Quebec."
During his own election-style tour of southwestern Ontario, Layton said seeking the deal was an act of conscience and that voters will cast judgment on his actions when they go to the polls.
"I understand the criticism, and not everybody's going to like what we're doing; that's life, that's why we have a democracy. People will execute their judgment on voting day," Layton told students during a question-and-answer session.
"I couldn't sleep at night if I knew that I had the chance to help some people get off the street and I didn't take it because I wanted the political advantage. I couldn't sleep at night."
Recent polls suggest Canadians do not want an election so soon after last spring's campaign, which has the leaders frantically passing the political hot potato of who will be to blame for touching off a spring campaign.
The Tories and Bloc are widely expected to try to bring down the government next month by voting against the budget or provoking another kind of non-confidence vote.
Even with NDP support, the Liberal government's survival is uncertain.
The Liberals would need all their 131 votes, the NDP's 19, and possibly those of all three independents, allowing the Liberal Speaker to cast the deciding ballot to bring the tally to 154.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
:-)
After all, you good folks got rid of Clinton. There must be hope for us. ;-)
In this regard, there is presently no other choice for any credible political party in Canada right now.
Good list, but you forgot one.....
Those unionized day cares will be staffed by social workers trained by socialist Canadian Universities.
Aaahhhhh! Save the children, now, while we still can!
"In this regard, there is presently no other choice for any credible political party in Canada right now."
I'll go one step further. I don't think there is ANY credible political party in Canada right now!
I can't even remember as far back as the last time they had one.
"After all, you good folks got rid of Clinton. There must be hope for us. ;-)"
Clinton was term limited we just had the brains to not elect Gore. I wish you guys luck! Dump the libs!
LOL
We need a bigger BBQ!
"After all, you good folks got rid of Clinton. There must be hope for us. ;-)"
No - he was president twice, which is the most he could serve.
We didn't "get rid of him" like you can in a parliamentary system.
To Ottawa, of all places!
Don't send it though, bring it and we will celebrate together!
I think you're talking about Chuck Cadman (sp), former conservative party member? He hasn't said how he'll vote, but some say he is principled.
The other two are David Kilgour (quit the libs last week to sit as an independent), and Carolyn ("stomp on the Bush doll") Parrish.
Kilgour won't say what he'll do, and the Parrish will support the Gov. that threw her out.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While reviewing this post, (spell check, etc.), it occurred to me that the future of my country depends on the judgment of these three people.
OMG! Sob.
You had the passion and organization to elect George W. Bush twice!
I wish you guys luck! Dump the libs!
Thanks for the good wishes DM1. We will work our butts off to do just that! :-)
Good point.
Pros and cons to everything, eh?
A bit unrelated, but what sort of democracy is this set up in Iraq? Parliamentary and Republican democracies are winner take all. The winner forms the cabinet. But it sounds like all parties will participate in forming the cabinet in Iraq?
The provincial Liberals in BC are the party of the right. Their website says upfront that they are not affiliated with the federal Liberals.
The NDP are the socialists.
The Liberals will win the BC election.
Chuck said his constituents want the Liberals out el pronto, so he is going to support the wishes of those who voted for him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.