Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bipartisan bungling on the border
Town Hall.com ^ | 4/27/05 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 04/27/2005 11:21:47 AM PDT by JoeBob

Bipartisan bungling on borders Michelle Malkin

April 27, 2005

Whip-cracking Hillary Clinton (call her Hillary Buchanan) wants a "border czar." In a letter to U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Sen. Clinton, D-N.Y., wrote this week: "National security and, in particular, security at our borders, must continue to be paramount."

Catch no. 1: Sen. Clinton only wants a border czar for the border between the United States and Canada, despite the fact that the vast majority of illegal border-crossers come from the south.

Catch no. 2: Though stipulating that national security must be "paramount," Sen. Clinton also insists that the Bush administration "be sensitive" to "tourism and the regional economy" -- which is why she opposes a quite reasonable Homeland Security plan to mandate the use of passports for travelers entering the U.S. from Canada or Mexico.

Imposing this security measure on short-term visitors would put needed pressure on both of our neighbors to shore up their ID validation systems. Entry into this country is a privilege, not a right. Yet, border dominatrix Hillary opposes the rule.

Now, before my fellow conservatives get all outraged about Hillary's politically calculated doublespeak on border security, here's another catch: President Bush has the exact same position as Hillary. When he learned about the passport requirement plan earlier this month -- a plan he signed into law last December as part of the so-called intelligence reform bill -- he worried that it could "disrupt the honest flow of traffic." After expressing ignorance about his own policies, Bush ordered State and Homeland Security to reconsider the passport rules.

What a pair: Sen. Conniver and President Clueless. Pick your poison. Either way, we're committing national suicide.

I have said often that the only thing saving the Republicans on the immigration issue is the Democrats' stupidity. No more. Hillary may only be playing dress-up on border security, but that's far more than most of the cowering GOP elite in Washington is willing to do. And she's not alone among Democrats who are beginning to exploit the White House's vulnerability. Sounding positively O'Reillyian, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., complained that an agricultural illegal alien amnesty bill sponsored by GOP Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, and defeated last week would have been a "huge magnet" for illegal immigration. Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., sponsored a successful amendment funding Border Patrol agents, immigration investigators and interior enforcement agents that the Bush administration had shortchanged.

And as Manhattan Institute fellow Heather Mac Donald reported on our group website, The Immigration Blog (www.michellemalkin.com/immigration): "Maxine Waters, who represents South Los Angeles, erupted in a tirade against Hispanic and black gang members last week" on illegal alien gangs. Railed Rep. Waters:

"Why isn't anyone talking about the Mexican Mafia (a gang of illegal Mexicans that controls the California prison system)?" she thundered. "I don't care if you're pink or purple or white or black or brown, I want you out if you're committing crimes." There is no excuse not to control the border, she said. "I'm a liberal with a capital 'L'," she said, "but I'm sick of it."

This week in D.C., following on the heels of the successful Minuteman Project, hundreds of citizen lobbyists descended on Capitol Hill to send the same message. They are being led by some of the nation's most influential conservative radio talk shows in every major market -- including organizer Roger Hedgecock from San Diego, Melanie Morgan from San Francisco, "The John and Ken Show" based in Los Angeles, Lars Larson in Portland, and Michael Smerconish in Philadelphia. On their agenda: fixing the nation's broken deportation and detention system; ending sanctuary policies that give illegal aliens safe haven; strengthening interior enforcement; and shutting off illegal alien magnets including health, education and Social Security benefits.

One participant reported that the staff of Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., refused to admit her to his office. But the reception from Beltway Republicans hasn't been much warmer. And the White House still won't meet with pro-immigration enforcement leaders such as Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., and the House Immigration Reform Caucus.

As long as the elites in both parties continue to act like scared monkeys, Americans will be forced to take homeland security into their own hands. We are all Minutemen now.

Michelle Malkin is a syndicated columnist and maintains her weblog at michellemalkin.com


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alreadyposted; michellemalkin; repeat
Another great article by Michelle. If Hillory wants a border czar Michelle would make a great one.
1 posted on 04/27/2005 11:21:48 AM PDT by JoeBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JoeBob

Pictures please. We must all follow the rules.


2 posted on 04/27/2005 11:26:33 AM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Uleryrns
Putting illegal aliens in the military? You got to be kidding. It would not be worth the effort, I had to listen to enough of that "I no understand English" crap when I was training soldiers. There is no friggin way I want them in the military or beside me in combat.
4 posted on 04/27/2005 11:51:13 AM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Uleryrns
Also, we put up a big fence with electric current running through it and wire at the top, like you see at prisons.

then we would need a wildlife czar.

5 posted on 04/27/2005 11:55:39 AM PDT by Minnesoootan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Uleryrns
And for the illegals that are already here, we weed them out and put them in our military. If they want to come here, they serve the country FIRST.

How will you filter out the narco terrorists, the gang members (Mara Salvatrucha aka MS-13),al qaida, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Shinning path...etc

One nice thing the Wahabbist already have their own chaplains in the military so they wont lack for spiritual inspiration

imo

6 posted on 04/27/2005 11:57:25 AM PDT by joesnuffy (The generation that survived the depression and won WW2 proved poverty does not cause crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Uleryrns
And for the illegals that are already here, we weed them out and put them in our military. If they want to come here, they serve the country FIRST.

How will you filter out the narco terrorists, the gang members (Mara Salvatrucha aka MS-13),al qaida, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Shinning path...etc

One nice thing the Wahabbist already have their own chaplains in the military so they wont lack for spiritual inspiration

imo

7 posted on 04/27/2005 11:59:58 AM PDT by joesnuffy (The generation that survived the depression and won WW2 proved poverty does not cause crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Uleryrns

Explain what you mean by pulling our service men out of places where they aren't needed, if you would please. I did not think we had anyone where they were not needed, since we don't seem to have enough military forces to go around.


8 posted on 04/27/2005 12:05:10 PM PDT by Goodgirlinred ( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JoeBob

Thanks O 'smartest woman in the world'! Instead of properly funding the Border Patrol and enforcing existing laws let's create a whole new department of bloodsucking bureaucrats and have them supposedly focused on a border that isn't the main point of illegal entry. While we're at it outfit this new department's personell in designer uniforms and matching handbags.


9 posted on 04/27/2005 12:15:23 PM PDT by Lee Heggy (Sorry, I don't do Windows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeBob

Does it have to be a Czar. I mean, wouldn't it be cheaper to get like an Arch-Duke or a Count?


10 posted on 04/27/2005 12:31:27 PM PDT by CATravelAgent (Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CATravelAgent
We already have a Count on the Mexican border and he's very happpy there.


"11,472,523 illegal aliens...Aha ah ah!"

11 posted on 04/27/2005 12:54:48 PM PDT by NewRomeTacitus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JoeBob
And as Manhattan Institute fellow Heather Mac Donald reported on our group website, The Immigration Blog (www.michellemalkin.com/immigration): "Maxine Waters, who represents South Los Angeles, erupted in a tirade against Hispanic and black gang members last week" on illegal alien gangs. Railed Rep. Waters:

"Why isn't anyone talking about the Mexican Mafia (a gang of illegal Mexicans that controls the California prison system)?" she thundered. "I don't care if you're pink or purple or white or black or brown, I want you out if you're committing crimes." There is no excuse not to control the border, she said. "I'm a liberal with a capital 'L'," she said, "but I'm sick of it."

The Republicans are going to lose big in the not too distant future if they don't change course and come out firmly for national sovereignty and border protection.

12 posted on 04/27/2005 3:35:50 PM PDT by Colorado Buckeye (It's the culture stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Uleryrns

I agree we need to protect our borders. I don't think we should dismiss the border with Canada, either.


14 posted on 04/28/2005 9:56:19 AM PDT by Goodgirlinred ( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson