Posted on 04/26/2005 5:02:47 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
ST. PETERSBURG - The mother of the 5-year-old girl who was handcuffed at school by police has withdrawn her daughter from Pinellas public schools and is moving out of state, superintendent Clayton Wilcox said Monday night.
The development was the latest in a bizarre saga that began Friday, when a videotape of the handcuffing was made public.
Since then, wrenching video images of the wailing kindergartener being handcuffed by St. Petersburg police have raced around the globe, airing and re-airing on television news shows in the United States, Great Britain, Spain, around Asia and beyond.
On Monday morning, the Largo lawyer representing the girl's mother appeared on five network news shows. He returned wearily to his office to find a fax from the mother, 24-year-old Inga Akins, stating he had been fired. The fax had been sent from the tabloid TV show A Current Affair, on which the mother appeared Friday and Monday.
Also on Monday came the prospect that the Rev. Al Sharpton would be coming to town. The famous New York crusader and one-time presidential candidate is intrigued and considering weighing in on the episode, his staff said.
"Instantly he felt that it smelled bad, but he wants to research it first," said his spokeswoman Rachel Nordlinger. "It could be a case of police brutality or a case of her civil rights being violated."
Wilcox had no further information on Akins' move to pull the girl out of school. She was handcuffed at Fairmount Park Elementary on March 14 and transferred to another public school after the incident.
Wilcox said he found out about her leaving the system when he asked his staff Monday how she was doing in the new school.
A call to Akins' cell phone went unreturned Monday night.
Pinellas County records show that a St. Petersburg apartment complex where she lived moved to evict her on March 31, about two weeks after the handcuffing that put her daughter's face on TV screens across he world.
Wilcox said the girl had been out of school since Thursday.
John Trevena, who had been serving as the attorney for Akins, said he learned from an executive producer at A Current Affair that the girl and her mother traveled to New York City over the weekend, where they stayed at the show's expense.
The case of the handcuffed little girl was the top story on the tabloid program Monday night, with images of the girl smelling a flower and running through a park laughing.
The show interviewed a child psychologist who said the handcuffing might be racially motivated. A Current Affair also said the girl "had to flee her home to escape the media."
The show blamed Trevena's release of the video to major media outlets last week, including the St. Petersburg Times . The lawyer said a producer from the show "raged" at him last Friday, saying the release of the video violated an exclusive agreement between Akins and A Current Affair.
Trevena said he had been unaware of any agreement.
The show made no mention of its part in the media frenzy that has followed the video.
A Current Affair clearly communicated it had every intention of running the videotape, Trevena said. He also said the show interviewed Akins and her daughter only days after the handcuffing incident.
On Friday, a few hours after the video began screaming across the world, the show announced to the media that it had an exclusive.
It sent out a news release titled: "Five-year-old African American girl handcuffed by three police officers. A Current Affair gets first national look at incident on tape."
The program Monday evening did not disclose on air how much it had paid Akins for the story. When asked what the sum was Monday afternoon, a spokeswoman for the show laughed at the question. She said there would be no comment on the story.
Trevena called the program's actions "highly unethical and possibly illegal." He said he was concerned that his client was in New York discussing the case with another party without legal advice.
The videotape shows the girl defying an assistant principal and another school staff member as she tore items off walls and swung at the educators.
Later, it shows the girl in the assistant principal's office tearing items off a bulletin board, climbing on a table and swinging at the assistant principal numerous times.
The video ends after about 28 minutes with the girl crying as three St. Petersburg police officers place her in handcuffs.
The girl had a history of problems at the school, though the full extent is not known because student records are not public.
District officials have discussed an incident several weeks before the handcuffing in which a city police officer was called to the school because of a behavior problem with the girl. The officer said something to her about the possibility of being handcuffed if her behavior continued.
Akins later objected to that conversation, part of an ongoing feud with the school over her daughter's treatment.
District officials say the video started as an exercise by the girl's teacher to improve her craft in the classroom. But they acknowledge that the girl's history may have played a part in the decision to keep the camera rolling that day.
Though city police are being harshly criticized for their role in the incident, the department declined Wednesday to elaborate on the rationale for the handcuffing, citing a pending investigation.
Police spokesman Bill Proffitt said the department stood by a statement made in mid March, which was that department policy allows the handcuffing of minors in certain situations.
How did an incident that received mild attention in March blossom into a worldwide phenomenon five weeks later?
The video, said Matthew Felling, media director at The Center for Media and Public Affairs in Washington, D.C.
"It's not necessarily about the little girl, it's about the visceral nature of it," he said. "Is it compelling? Yes. Is it emotional porn? Yes. Is it internationally relevant news? No."
He said too many media outlets had been airing only part of the video, which is about 28 minutes long.
"This story is driven by 10 seconds of footage - two seconds of the tantrum and eight seconds of handcuffing," he said. "Completely taken out of context, but that is the media's way."
All of this is going on AFTER the teacher took away the jelly beans she had given her earlier.
My question was not of the school but of the mother. I haven't seen anything other than what was posted here and what has been on the evening news.
I understood the reference to meetings as having come from the mother not the school. However, as in all things, I could easily be wrong.
I didn't watch the whole tape, so I didn't really know what was going on. I could see immediately that the teacher was setting the kid up for a little show, though. The teacher and the principle should be fired. Then the kid's family should be investigated by social services to find out why the mother was too busy to come to the school. There is obviously something wrong with the child, but this wasn't the way to handle it. The two times that I know of the police being called, the mothers were both present as well.
The big news in all of this is not the story itself. It is the fact that some genius thought it was necessary to put A Current Afair back on the air. Even with the same graphics and noises...I turned the channel the other night and thought it was 1986 all over again.
Something to ponder:
My Paternal Grandmother was full-blood Northern Cheyenne. She was born at a time when the reservations were really getting going (she was born in the early 1880's)
She didn't like the way she (and her people) was treated by "white" society--but he also realized there were plenty of whites (and other races) that WERE good people.
She always hated the "victim mentality" syndrome---and those that used it to get away with anything they possibly could. She got plenty tired of the lazy good-for-nothings that sat on the 'res' and whined about how hard they had it---alll the while collecting their monthly checks from the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
I remember a VERY long time ago, when she spotted a teen on the 'res' doing the whining bit. She listened for a bit, went up to him and gave him a smack and some good advice:
"Get off your sorry ass and get a job"
????
Yes, it was..and, it's FICTION!
My grandmother and her sister were named by the midwife..Mabel and Myrtle, so this is not new. Where I work we had a girl named Velvet Beavers- who can say this was not recklessness bordering on abuse. Outside of TV who can say that bloack kids named Mike or Susan don't have it easier than kids named Ja'Neisha or Condolezza?
You said: You did know, of course, that one of the ways African-Americans were kept at the bottom of the pile in the South was to not teach them English~!
Yes, I knew that. I went to a predominantly black high school, by the way, in the early 70s, at a time when most blacks (at least the ones I hung out with) were working to be a part of the mainstream of society. They were black and proud, as they'd say. This was when many blacks wore the red, green and black patches, but the era of African-sounding names had not arrived. I am aware that some of these names have meanings, and certainly everyone has the right to the name of his or her choosing (or the parent's choosing). My kids's names are Samuel and Hannah (Bible names we promised during infertility times, rewarded with twins). We could have named them Snookie and Blossom, or some other names, with meaning or without, but there is a certain reality about how such children are viewed, and the obtstacle that must be overcome, for right or wrong. If a parent knows this, why create the problem? Is having a Yoruba name (if that is what this is) more important than being judged for one's talents and abilities?
We have no idea where she worked or how far her commute might have been.
Years ago when I worked in downtown DC and had no parking space I relied on public transportation. If they needed me at school, I would have had to have taken a taxicab, and it would have been a 45 minute trip.
Commuting times are really bad around here. I didn't find the mother's response concerning how long it would take her to get to the school out of line.
The other individual in the conversation was Jewish. I don't believe they use that name for their kids.
What was happening, however, was that African-Americans who managed to move out of the world of Gullah and Geetchie and learned passable English simply adopted names similar to those used by the larger culture!
BTW, when I first started working at Post Office Department Headquarters we still had employees who knew those older languages. One of them, Gullah I believe, is an Yoruba dialect with lots of English, Spanish and French vocabulary. The other one, Geetchie, is actually English with lots of Yoruba, Spanish and French vocabulary.
There was no uniform standard so if you moved around the South where these languages were spoken you'd have to make serious adjustments.
The day I retired I don't think we had a single individual who knew more than a handful of words from either language.
What was happening, however, was that African-Americans who managed to move out of the world of Gullah and Geetchie and learned passable English simply adopted names similar to those used by the larger culture!
BTW, when I first started working at Post Office Department Headquarters we still had employees who knew those older languages. One of them, Gullah I believe, is an Yoruba dialect with lots of English, Spanish and French vocabulary. The other one, Geetchie, is actually English with lots of Yoruba, Spanish and French vocabulary.
There was no uniform standard so if you moved around the South where these languages were spoken you'd have to make serious adjustments.
The day I retired I don't think we had a single individual who knew more than a handful of words from either language.
The host cracks me up. He is a real-life version of David Puddy (Elaine's boyfriend the last few seasons) from Seinfeld right down to his squinty eyes.
A couple of weeks ago I was home sick for a couple of days and watched it. At the end of one of the segments my husband said, "High five" and we just cracked up!
This school district better have some good lawyers because they are going to need them. I have to wonder why the teacher didn't just request that the girl be classified special ed. Perhaps the mother had refused permission for the testing and that led to the video taping.
The little girl, Ja'eisha was acting like a brat. However, given the way she couldn't sit still i wouldn't be surprised to find out she's on some kind of medication which is causing her to act that way.
She doesn't look 24, she looks more like 34-44.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.