It's nice to know you can count on someone like Farah for a regular dose of stupidity every day.
No kidding.
It's nice to know you can count on someone like Farah for a regular dose of stupidity every day.
My sentiments exactly.
Yep and we can always count on a segment of FR to actually believe his crap.
Tancredo is nothing but an attention whore. His sellout of Tom Delay should prove that to anyone. Of course there are those who would blindly follow this guy straight off a cliff simply because he tells them what they want to hear.
There is much sense in what this fellow has to say.
I don't know anything about Tancredo aside from the fact that he and Sensenbrenner and a handfull of others are the only politicians to comment on the elephant in the living room - the illegal invasion of our Country by hordes of foreigners through the Mexican border with the open connivance of the American and Mexican governments.
I also know that what he states about the apparent ineptitude of the Republicans thus far to get an effecetive agenda going, even though they control the Presidency and both houses is equally true.
Were the situation the reverse and the Democrats the recipients of such power, America would be a far more socialist country than it is now.
As long as the Republican party is represented by people like Linicoln Chaffee, Olympia Snow, Hegel, Voinovich, McCain, Tom Kean, Chrissie Whitman and the like, the Democrats win - even when they loose.
Serious consideration should be given to either a shake up of the current Republican party, or setting the groundwork for a third party - a more effective conservative party which is not afraid to stand up for its political convictions.
It happened in the mid-1800's and it can and should happen again if the Republican leadership doesn't get its act together and better espouse the conservative views of the majority of its constituents and of the nation.
Don't know about stupidity but based upon his statement below from the article I'd say he has a very limited grasp of how things actually work in D.C. Especially the Senate 1/2 of the Congress.
Listed below is the control over the Senate the Republicans have had since President Bush was inaugurated in Jan. 2001. Take these numbers and couple it with the Senators who don't support the President full time from the Republican Party and you'll find they basically have had only a very limited controlling majority at best.... Certainly not large enough to force things down the Democrats throats as many call for. Farah.... a joke.
Rep Dem Other 107th (2001-2003) 50 50 [Jan. 3-20, 2001] 50 50 [Jan. 20-June 6, 2001] 49 50 1 [Jun 6, 2001-Nov. 12, 2002] 50 48 2 [Nov. 12, 2002 - Jan. 3, 2003] 108th (2003-2005) 51 48 1 109th (2005-2007) 55 44 1