Skip to comments.
Hillary the Great (Great Read!)
NewsMax ^
| 4/25/05
| Charles R. Smith
Posted on 04/25/2005 6:30:06 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Of course, it is difficult to explain why Mrs. Clinton could not recall, had no recollection or simply forgot 250 times while under oath. Clearly, most ordinary people cannot perform such a stunt in front of a federal judge without spending some time behind bars or in a hospital. Hopefully, that will all change with her latest criminal escapade.
1
posted on
04/25/2005 6:30:12 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
...."Moctar's gardener managed to contribute $450,000 directly to Bill Clinton in a single check....."
I'd forgotton that. Maybe it's time for Babs to start warbling Memories so we can bring back all those daily news-scum cycles
2
posted on
04/25/2005 6:34:35 PM PDT
by
aShepard
To: aShepard
You know what would be a great thing to do - begin a series of "10 years Ago - In The Clinton Era." This would go day by day documenting what is now known in court documents and the public record of just what the Clintons were up to or involved in that day. For example - April 25, 1995 - Grand jury is convened for the X day on Whitewater. Investigations into bank fraud. Etc.
3
posted on
04/25/2005 6:45:06 PM PDT
by
Amalie
(FREEDOM had NEVER been another word for nothing left to lose...)
To: wagglebee
Hillary the Great....
...BIG FART!
4
posted on
04/25/2005 6:54:26 PM PDT
by
JOE6PAK
("Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.")
To: wagglebee
5
posted on
04/25/2005 6:55:09 PM PDT
by
mo
To: wagglebee
I've got a real Constitutional problem with Hillary! running for President.
The 22nd Amendment states: Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice ....
I want proof that Hillary! is not BJ's Trojan horse for a third term.
To: wagglebee
I'll say what I said before and that is her reelection is going to hinge on whether a dem wins the governorship or not. Admittedly alot of people in Ny might not know that if she wins reelection, runs for Prez and (shutters) wins, then the governor assigns a candidate from their party for the remainder of the term.
I also still believe there is a good chance that she doesn't even run for reelection. It avoids denying she will run for Prez, avoids her voting on issues up to election day 2008 and allows her to run all over the country while running some NGO targeted at a certain segment of national voters.
7
posted on
04/25/2005 7:13:29 PM PDT
by
torchthemummy
("Sober Idealism Equals Pragmatism")
To: Right_in_Virginia
Hey, you have a great point. It got me thinking that since she called herself along with the entire liberal media that she was "co-president" perhaps we ought to amend the Constitution that says, "co-presidents" cannot run for the office of the presidency more than 2 terms of the other co-president that they were both co together. Or something like that.
Actually, I really think that Hillary was the president and Bill was the co-president since he had to delegate so much of his office to her since he couldn't keep his pants zipped and got her into a fine mettle and for Bill to make up for his screw-ups he had to give her lots of authority.
8
posted on
04/25/2005 7:17:22 PM PDT
by
harpo11
To: Right_in_Virginia
I want proof that Hillary! is not BJ's Trojan horse for a third term. Hell, I always figured that BJ was Hitlery's Trojan horse for HER first two terms!
9
posted on
04/25/2005 7:19:36 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
She has opposed a variety of Republican-sponsored legislation but so far has left no memorable legal mark. I guess that Health Care issue left a bigger mark than we imagined, and so she is lying low on legislation till she has the WH again, which I pray will never happen.
10
posted on
04/25/2005 7:22:46 PM PDT
by
GretchenM
(Tom Daschle still calls dem shots -- via Harry Reid.)
To: wagglebee
11
posted on
04/25/2005 7:47:07 PM PDT
by
I_be_tc
To: wagglebee
Early next year the good citizens of New York are to select a new senator.Two things wrong with that statement: November 2006 is not "early next year," and they won't restrict the vote to good citizens--bad citizens, non-citizens, and deceased citizens will have their votes counted as well.
It may be true that she has done nothing of note as senator, other than get herself on TV a lot, but the average person doesn't realize that. If you were to take a poll asking people to name the most influential Democrat in the Senate, she'd probably get the largest share of the responses.
To: Verginius Rufus
Let's not forget about PIAPs masters thesis. It is still sealed at Wesley??( not sure that is right) and has never come out. My theory is that it proves she is a communist from early days. Why can't we read her thesis???
To: wagglebee
14
posted on
04/25/2005 8:23:21 PM PDT
by
harpu
To: Amalie
Not a bad idea, except we would be preaching to the choir. What we need is an ongoing reminder to the American people. If Hitlery gets the nomination, then is the time to hit her with everything and hard. Hopefully, a lot of powerful people will want her destroyed and with some strong grassroots support, it can be done. A strong Republican team needs to emerge at the right strategic time. Watch out for a third party candidate to spoil things like Ross Perot did.
15
posted on
04/25/2005 8:26:53 PM PDT
by
unkus
To: Amalie
Not a bad idea, except we would be preaching to the choir. What we need is an ongoing reminder to the American people. If Hitlery gets the nomination, then is the time to hit her with everything and hard. Hopefully, a lot of powerful people will want her destroyed and with some strong grassroots support, it can be done. A strong Republican team needs to emerge at the right strategic time. Watch out for a third party candidate to spoil things like Ross Perot did.
16
posted on
04/25/2005 8:27:06 PM PDT
by
unkus
To: wagglebee
This article underestimates Hillary's ability to snow the public, and overestimates by a mile the public's ability to recall past events.
Not to mention the writer's assumption that the public, when reminded of past transgressions, will care one iota about them.
The public will only pay attention to a few seconds of the evening news, and she will put forth a positive attitude with well-choreographed sound bites. And unless the Republicans have a super candidate, she will win.
17
posted on
04/25/2005 8:27:57 PM PDT
by
Rocky
To: Right_in_Virginia
Trojan Horse is right. These people can't be trusted in any way. There are too many scenarios to look at. What if Willie dies of some STD? Would that help her? Too many possibilities at this early stage. One thing is certain; the better one knows one's enemy, the easier to destroy him.
18
posted on
04/25/2005 8:33:01 PM PDT
by
unkus
To: wagglebee
I'm Hillary the rat I am
Hillary the rat I am, I am
I got married to the Bill next door
Now he's out chasing skirts just like before
And every one knows it wasn't Hillary (Hillary)
I'm married to a wild Willy not a Sam (no Sam)
I get accused of being a drag queen looking like a man, I'm Hillary
Hillary the rat I am
Second verse same as the first
lol
To: Amalie
Sir Edmund Hillary Clinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson