Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia's Rocket Drone [launched from MLRS]
DEFENSETECH.ORG ^ | 2005 Apr 25

Posted on 04/25/2005 4:25:28 PM PDT by Wiz

One of the nastier weapons in the Russian arsenal is getting an unmanned spotter. According to C4ISR Journal, the Smerch multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) can now be stuffed with a drone that spots a target 90 kilometers away in just four minutes.

The 92-pound unmanned aerial vehicle, or UAV, is fired in one of the Smerch's 300 mm rockets. Once it gets to its target, it can loiter for about a half-hour at an altitude of 600 to 1800 feet.

(Excerpt) Read more at defensetech.org ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: drone; mlrs; russia; smerch; uav

ARRRGGG! The Russians invented something nasty! US Armed Force needs these too.
1 posted on 04/25/2005 4:25:36 PM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Wiz

MLRS refers (exclusively) to the US-developed M270 family.

Russians have multiple rocket launchers (generic term) or MRLs


2 posted on 04/25/2005 4:28:13 PM PDT by No Longer Free State (The last thing Reuters wants is a free and unfettered Iraqi press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wiz

What would a metal storm cannon do to this UAV while loitering? As I'm sure many of you on FR know, (and are tired of hearing) I see this weapon as a jack-of-all-trades godsend for multiple future combat situations.


3 posted on 04/25/2005 4:35:48 PM PDT by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wiz
Once it gets to its target, it can loiter for about a half-hour at an altitude of 600 to 1800 feet.
=======

Huh! Easy fix! Just put up a "NO LOITERING" sign !!! ;-))

.

4 posted on 04/25/2005 4:36:23 PM PDT by GeekDejure ( LOL = Liberals Obey Lucifer !!! -- Impeach Greer !!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wiz
It is kind of amazing that a low-speed drone can successfully deploy out of the missile. Wonder if we have any White Sands Missile Range prototypes that can do the same (or maybe Nellis Range secret systems).
5 posted on 04/25/2005 4:44:04 PM PDT by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wiz

I thought James Bond wiped out SMERSH long ago.


6 posted on 04/25/2005 4:44:04 PM PDT by Colinsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Longer Free State
Affirmative.
7 posted on 04/25/2005 4:44:56 PM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
What would a metal storm cannon do to this UAV while loitering?

It would slice it into titanium confetti (but I'm sure they were fly it at a low altitude and avoid the cannon to the extent possible). My guess is that it will have a much lower operational minimum altitude than 600 feet when operating over smooth terrain.

8 posted on 04/25/2005 4:48:15 PM PDT by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wiz


Now, that's one big freakin' rocket launcher.
9 posted on 04/25/2005 4:49:13 PM PDT by andyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wiz

Loitering all day long won't be much help if it's BEING JAMMED.


10 posted on 04/25/2005 5:07:13 PM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wiz
"altitude of 600 to 1800 feet"
Sounds like easy pickens for groundfire.
11 posted on 04/25/2005 5:07:45 PM PDT by ProudVet77 ("Warning: Frequent sarcastic posts")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BearWash

"Loiter and attack munition" and "Precision attack munition":

Lockheed Martin MLRS, HIMARS and MFOM activities are also supporting tomorrow's Objective Force structures and capabilities.

One key component is the LAM. Currently in technology demonstration status, LAM will provide a 280-km range with 45-minute loiter time.

Initial design activities indicate that 12 LAMs could be packaged in a single HIMARS launch pod. Tactical missile systems like LAM are also seen as providing a key component of the emerging "system of systems" structure that will comprise the pivotal Future Combat System (FCS).

During his AUSA presentation, Dr. Allen Adler, director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), noted, "We will have a network of sensors and we will also have a network of fires."

He described a key concept within the network of fires that would feature "a vertically launched missile system that could be brought in close in the theater [of operations] to engage targets very quickly."

Known as "Netfires," the DARPA-managed network of fires program (jointly funded by DARPA and Army Science and Technology activities) targets the development and tests a containerized, platform-independent multi-mission weapon concept as an enabling technology element for FCS.


12 posted on 04/25/2005 5:18:02 PM PDT by No Longer Free State (The last thing Reuters wants is a free and unfettered Iraqi press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
Loitering all day long won't be much help if it's BEING JAMMED.

By what?

13 posted on 04/25/2005 5:19:54 PM PDT by No Longer Free State (The last thing Reuters wants is a free and unfettered Iraqi press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: No Longer Free State

The idea behind LAM/PAM is that you fire a bunch of munitions, let them fly around for a while near expected enemy areas, and then have them quickly attack targets.

The problem is:

a) maintaining comms with the munition, because, by definition, the munition is where you *aren't*

b) Given the fuel consumption/loiter time, having enough space on the munition for actual *explosives*

It's a DARPA run program, so expect it to be expensive, inpractible, and fall far short of it's objectives.

-R


14 posted on 04/25/2005 6:07:12 PM PDT by talosiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: No Longer Free State
Loitering all day long won't be much help if it's BEING JAMMED.

By what?

Oh, my naieve friend - by the EMP from Iran's nuclear missiles detonating over our heads of course! :)

15 posted on 04/25/2005 6:21:35 PM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson