Diaperless Babies Seen As Earth-Friendly Solution (Enviro-wacko alert)

CNSNews.com ^ | 4/22/05 | Marc Morano

[jalisco555]

Greens are always good for a laugh.

[American Butterfly]

Ugh!

[Fierce Allegiance]

Another truly s#itty idea from the lib whacks.

[pikachu]

Wow! And I bet who ever wrote this actually got paid for this too!

[mikeus_maximus]

You have to wonder how may of these "parents" were themselevs runnning around butt naked among their numerous mommies and daddies in a hippie commune 35 years ago.

[cicero's_son]

Hilarious.

It reads like satire.

[Pondman88]

Yes, the mad rush of suburban mothers going diaper-less has Pampers executives in a tizzy.

Cue the crickets!!!!

[Behind Liberal Lines]

Why do I have a bad feeling we will see this all over Ithaca within a few short months?

[sharkhawk]

Noelle finally chose to go diaperless and looked to traditional cultures for inspiration. "How I longed for a simple, dirt-floored, baby-friendly hut like that of a Yequana family," he wrote. .

Simple solution, MOVE.

[Mr. Jeeves]

Noelle finally chose to go diaperless and looked to traditional cultures for inspiration. "How I longed for a simple, dirt-floored, baby-friendly hut like that of a Yequana family," he wrote.

Pitch your tent in the woods, nitwit. No one is stopping you.

[jtminton]

I have a question. How can something be retro AND cutting-edge at the same time?

[The_Victor]

"There is a way to have a baby and NOT use diapers," says one website advocating diaperless babies. Parents are urged to get in tune with their infant's body signals and hold babies over toilets, buckets and shrubbery or any other convenient receptacle when nature calls.

Let me be the first to suggest that the dolts suggesting this as an alternative to diapers, don't have any children. And clearly have never dealt with children of diaper age.

[Professional Engineer]

Obviously, these morons have never had children of their own.

[aberaussie]

They should go first and test it out for the rest of us!

[ClearCase_guy]

I bet Triumph the Insult Dog would have interesting things to say about this idea ...

[jalisco555]

Parents are urged to get in tune with their infant's body signals and hold babies over toilets, buckets and shrubbery or any other convenient receptacle when nature calls.

Imagine eating at a restaurant while the mom at the next table is holding her baby over a bucket. Certainly adds to the ambiance!

[Junior]

Natec agrees with Noelle that modern society has a lot to learn from the traditional ways of life.

Like how to cope with high infant mortality and short life expectancies...

[dead]

People around the world who have no access to diapers manage to raise children

Yes, these are the same people who shit in their own drinking water and have a life expectency that tops out in the late twenties.

Liberals always aspire to emulate the biggest losers on the planet, and they usually succeed.

[Fitzcarraldo]

Give them rice bowls send them off to a Mongolian commune.

[tfecw]

"These parents may rely on using public bathrooms, or bring along a container such as a tight -lidded bucket,"

That better be one hell of a tight lidded bucket. Then again I'm not sure if my Road Rage could handle having a bucket of poo on the front seat. First guy who tail gates me off is getting the mother load. High lob timed to hit his windshield at 60 miles an hour. Would that be biological war fare?
This is crazy, but if welfare states (ie NY) who pay for diapers for people who apparently didn't have enough money to buy a condom would require this, I might be okay with it. It'd save a lot of money.