Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I hope the Michael Jackson jury isn't going to demand a "CSI" standard of proof when they decide the case. If Debbie Rowe's testimony doesn't seal his fate, nothing can. She's going to tell it like it was, not deliver a rehearsed, scripted monologue as a damage-control TV rebuttal.
1 posted on 04/24/2005 8:44:05 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CHARLITE

Dr. Klien was my zit not zot doctor when i was a teen

FWIW

FYI


2 posted on 04/24/2005 8:53:52 PM PDT by al baby (Dick Trickle is not just a medical condition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

CSI?

I figured it was more along the lines of a "Godfather" verdict.


3 posted on 04/24/2005 8:55:12 PM PDT by Askel5 († Theresa Marie Schindler, Martyr for the Gospel of Life, pray for us †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Who is Debbie Rowe?


4 posted on 04/24/2005 9:09:01 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Many people don't understand the difference between fact and fiction, science and pseudoscience, etc., these days.

I almost worked for the FBI lab back in the 90s. Sure glad I didn't, though, with how things went downhill with it.


5 posted on 04/24/2005 9:40:20 PM PDT by Gondring (Pretend you don't know me...I'm in the WPPFF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Patricia Cornwell novels also gave the layman a glimpse of forensic science as have many others. I wondered years ago reading about this is we were going to create super criminals. Apparently, according to this account, we are creating juries with increasing thresholds of reasonable doubt.


8 posted on 04/25/2005 12:17:22 PM PDT by IamConservative (To worry is to misuse your imagination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
Jurors decided that the prosecution had failed "to put the gun in his [Blake’s] hand" and that neither Blake’s skin nor clothes were marked with a single particle of the residue that might have been expected had he been the man who fired the Second World War era pistol that was used to kill his wife. ,

Notwithstanding that, Cooley accused the jury of failing in its duty. "Quite frankly, based on my review of the evidence, he [Blake] is as guilty as sin. He is a miserable human being."

Uh huh. Blame TV cuz you can't prove a case.

10 posted on 04/25/2005 12:23:48 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson