Perhaps someone isn't seeing the Big Picture here...
Joan, you have acquired the Southack disease--posting links that directly oppose your point. Kelley fabricated some evidence concerning a Serb atrocity in Kosovo. He said he got the evidence from Kandic. When questioned by USA Today, Kandic and the translator present disputed what Kelley said. That's your link--she helped get Kelley fired plus discredited his story about a Serb atrocity. Explain how that shows an anti-Serb bias.
Perhaps someone isn't seeing the Big Picture here...
Kelley and Kandic keep reappearing in "stories" of so-called Serb attrocities. These "stories" all contain some common denominators such as a lack of hard evidence (no photographs, no bodies, no human ashes, no human remains), often with "anonymous" sources cited.
That Kelley and Kandic worked together on articles is not in dispute; they certainly discussed things together. They also had the same mutual focus: claims against Serbs.
Kelley was *proven* to be a liar who fabricated entire articles, though that took years before the scandal grew large enough to get him fired.
...That Kandic denies originally telling lies to Kelley is no surprise, nor should it be surprising to see Kandic once again in the middle of "stories" aimed against Serbs that once again can't be verified (i.e. no hard evidence like photographs or body parts or human ashes).