To: blues-train
$30 million ? Why a freekin dime ?
To: blues-train
So stop taking taxpayer money...easy
3 posted on
04/22/2005 8:40:30 AM PDT by
Irontank
(Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under)
To: blues-train
...people inside the Public Broadcasting Service, see these recent developments as troubling....about $30 million in federal funds [goes to PBS].
Pay your own bills, PBS, and then you can make the rules.
To: blues-train
Aww.. Poor folks, having to present both sides of an issue. Now, about that 30 million.. How about we chop it in half for every bonehead report on 'art' that under almost any other circumstance would require the response - 'Honey? Where's the plunger?' Or 'Sweety? Did you take out the trash?'
5 posted on
04/22/2005 8:43:07 AM PDT by
kingu
To: blues-train
In negotiations with PBS earlier this year, the corporation also insisted, for the first time, on tying new funding to an agreement that would commit the network to strict "objectivity and balance" in each of its programs -- an idea that PBS's general counsel described in an internal memo as amounting to "government encroachment on and supervision of program content, potentially in violation of the First Amendment.
potentially in violation of the First Amendment? The federal funding for PBS and the CPB itself is definitely in violation of the 10th Amendment
6 posted on
04/22/2005 8:43:51 AM PDT by
Irontank
(Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under)
To: blues-train
PBS, they say, is being forced to toe a more conservative line in its programming by the Republican-dominated agency that provides about $30 million in federal funds to the Alexandria-based service. .......Go ahead PravdaBroadcastingSystem..bite that hand that feeds you.
8 posted on
04/22/2005 8:44:11 AM PDT by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
To: blues-train
Why isn't PBS a Conservative Public Network? Shouldn't it reflect the demographic reality of the US?
Why should PBS be a repository for Liberal ideas only? Why should the likes of Bill Moyers have more currency than say Britt Hume or Bill Kristol?
It isn't their money. It's yours!!
10 posted on
04/22/2005 8:48:01 AM PDT by
bubman
To: blues-train
When I flip through channels and for some reason stop on a pbs station: I see full length commercials from corporate donors, infomercials for some new age "doctor Phil" kinda guy, donation drives. That and the taking peoples money in taxes is a pretty sweet scam.
11 posted on
04/22/2005 8:48:39 AM PDT by
ocr1
To: blues-train
PBS is the funniest show I've ever seen. It's about these idiots who criticize the Conservatives 50 weeks out of a year then begs them for money during a two week fund raiser. The funniest part of this is the Conservatives keep giving. It's like being a white guy paying to go to a black comedy show knowing your going to get ripped on.
12 posted on
04/22/2005 8:49:24 AM PDT by
tobyhill
(The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
To: blues-train
pBS:
Eschew taking tax dollars and just have an extra Telethon.
After all, there are always plenty more liberals who are stupid enough to pay a hundred bucks for a coffee mug that says, "I love Castro!"...
15 posted on
04/22/2005 8:50:39 AM PDT by
EternalVigilance
('Quality of life': Another name for the slippery slope into barbarism.)
To: blues-train
While feeding from the public trough and under obligation to be balanced, they nevertheless run a propaganda machine.
Let's drop the charade, get off from pretending and off of existing from public money.
With their staffing they could not be impartial, even if they wanted to.
These people will find out if their services are worth wile of being funded by private monies.
Soros and cohorts just might find funding this machine to be beneficial for the party.
18 posted on
04/22/2005 8:57:20 AM PDT by
hermgem
To: blues-train
If PBS programming is so dad-gummed superior to the fare on cable or over-the-air commercial stations, let's see 'em sell those shows and get PBS hands the hell out of our pockets. Same deal with NPR.
After all, if the nerds at PBS are concerned that the tone of their progamming may be getting a titch more conservative, well, I guess PBS doesn't maintain a very balanced blend of programmiing - does it?
Whiners. Nothing but whiners.
19 posted on
04/22/2005 9:02:20 AM PDT by
RexBeach
("I can see it now. You and the moon. You wear a necktie so I'll know you." -Groucho Marx)
To: blues-train
Mr. Moyers is very, very well funded. He is paid $200,000 by The Florence & John Schuman Foundation. As the president, Moyers oversees $75 million in grant money. Much of it flows into some very interesting hands. In addition, Moyers has a production company that is paid by PBS, which, of course, gets taxpayer money. It is time to abolish PBS. The Real PBS

20 posted on
04/22/2005 9:06:48 AM PDT by
Beth528
To: blues-train
If we stop funding PBS the liberals will still own it and will likely get even more donations from Democrats.
Better that conservatives take it over and create a conservative network there that will be the answer to the middle-left FOX and the other radical communist networks.
We can finance our PBS network with the Democrat's tax dollars.
To: blues-train
Here's an idea:
First make PBS very conservative.
Then the Libs will WANT to de-fund it!
Problem solved!
26 posted on
04/22/2005 9:45:57 AM PDT by
Redbob
To: blues-train
I don't care how much money PBS takes from the Feds if they bring back good old British period drama like Upstairs Downstairs.
BUMP
27 posted on
04/22/2005 9:52:17 AM PDT by
tm22721
To: blues-train
PBS Concerned with Conservative Push Yes, and we're going to push into PBS if the new "fairness" doctrine goes into effect. I can't wait! Conservative TV and radio WITHOUT commercials! < :D
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson