Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Labyrinthos

I believe in creation and I agree that creation does not belong in the science class however there are many scientific reasons why the theory of macro-evolution is false. These scientific evidences against macro-evolution need to be included in science class.


24 posted on 04/21/2005 6:15:30 AM PDT by bigcat32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: bigcat32
however there are many scientific reasons why the theory of macro-evolution is false.

And all these reasons are promoted by the religious ID promoters, who have all the scientific rigor of the Sierra Club.

Sorry, but there is no genuine scientific challenge to evolution. Science doesn't even recognize the term "macro" evolution, which is a dodge to allow the accepted evidence of evolution to stand, yet still cling to religious dogma.

27 posted on 04/21/2005 6:20:32 AM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: bigcat32

PLease reread my "challenge." Again, I'm asking for the creationists to support their position not by attacking evolution, but by providing objective, positive evidence in support of creationsim that is not based upon a huge leap of religious faith.


30 posted on 04/21/2005 6:26:54 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson