PLease reread my "challenge." Again, I'm asking for the creationists to support their position not by attacking evolution, but by providing objective, positive evidence in support of creationsim that is not based upon a huge leap of religious faith.
My answer to that challenge is to read a book called "Darwin's Black Box". I think the author's name is Michael Behe. If you're serious about getting an answer to your question you will read this book.
Simple question: did the universe have a beginning? If so, what evidence exists that indicates the instigation of the universe is 'only' natural? In other words, under what evidentiary basis do you rule out a designer for the Big Bang?
"PLease reread my "challenge." Again, I'm asking for the creationists to support their position not by attacking evolution, but by providing objective, positive evidence in support of creationsim that is not based upon a huge leap of religious faith."
I assume evolutionists have evidence showing one species becoming another species? Has it been observed? Is it repeatable? If not, IT'S NOT SCIENCE.
Variations in species (micro-evolution) cannot explain how bacteria becomes human. Also, how does inorganic matter become organic? Also, isn't it AMAZING that a female AND male evolved in EVERY species at the same time so it can have babies? Because we know that different species (eg. dog and cat) cannot produce babies.
Who has religious faith now?
Proof of Creation? Look at the machine that you are inhabiting...