You ask any Freeper here and I think they would agree it would be strange (and dangerous) for you to to trespass on private property with a gun and expect the government to protect you from getting shot.
You're now imagining I'm advocating trespass & asking for government protection?
Now that is strange..
We should support the Constitution not "principles".
That's my contention, not yours. -- You are advocating some strange 'property right "principle"', one that allows you to infringe on our RKBA's.
Not try to invent new "rights" like the right to armed trespass.
I had an invitation to fish. Whether I'm armed while doing so is of no concern to the owner.
That's what liberals do, they try to find new rights in the penumbras of the Constitution.
Where did you find the 'right' to disarm me?
Nothing strange or unusual about restricting gun owners from private property. It's been legal since day one.
I had an invitation to fish.
You had a conditional invitation -- no guns.
Whether I'm armed while doing so is of no concern to the owner.
It's his property, he has the right to be concerned about anything or anyone on it. What would you do if he booted you off the land because they found out you had a gun -- sue him?
You are on private property with the permission of the owner - you obey his rules.
That's pretty rude, if nothing else. The man issues an invitation for you to fish on his property, sans weapons, and you would bring them anyway? Blatant disrespect for the owner, who, imo, would be perfectly justified in recinding the invitation when he found out and had you kicked off his property. I'm sure you would agree he would be within HIS rights to do so.