Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
Providing legal protection to sources makes it impossible to distinguish between legitimate and fictitious sources.

True, but no legal protection makes it far more difficult to discover government or corporate fraud.

I don't trust the press, but I trust the government even less. Bush won't be President forever. Now that we have some actual conservative news outlets, we need a protected conservative press in case Hillary becomes President.

27 posted on 04/19/2005 4:37:13 PM PDT by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: stinkerpot65
The best protection against government fraud is not "journalist immunity," but: 1) small government, and 2) an armed citizenry.

To take it one step further, the best way to limit government fraud is to eliminate the entire concept of a "government employee" as we know it. Every person employed by the government gets fired at the end of the year, and replaced by someone else -- that way, there would be no need for a government worker to have any fear of losing your job by exposing criminal activity on the part of his superiors.

41 posted on 04/19/2005 6:29:38 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson