Posted on 04/19/2005 4:21:21 AM PDT by bobjam
Last night the History Channel finished its two part series on the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt. Anyone have any thoughts?
Thank you-didn't watch it- Don't have history chanel(or cable) and I believe FDR was not the Saint but probably the
most destructive US President ever.From New Deal, and reconstructed Supreme Court- to submisison to the extra-
Constitutional United Nations shoe in to Communist dictatorship. Can't imagine any left leaning production that would portray him warts and all.. . as they would say
Nixon.
Yeah, It provided further credence to the notion that if FDR totally had his way, we'd be completely Socialist by now.
I am not seeing a picture of this book you speak of. Could you post the ISBN # please? Thank you.
I read FDR's Folly last year, which pretty much lets the reader know the FDR legend is pure PR. His New Deal alphabet soup program was purely a vote getting machine. He rewarded states he needed for vote for reelection and ignored other states that were in the bag. The south he nearly completely ignored. They were in the bag. Funny when you read the book. States today that are totally blue such as Maryland and California were Republican states. However, the difference between Repubs and Dems were nearly indistinguishable as many Repubs during the time had socialist leanings. My opinion - FDR was one of the most dangerous and inept presidents we ever had. He happened to be President at the start of WW II but I give more credit to George C. Marshall Ernest King than to FDR. Marshall - though never holding a field command during wartime - kept a black book of individuals who impressed him during the 20's and 30's. When the war hit, he had a ready list of men to lead the military machine. FDR was a dimwit who thought he knew what he was talking about.
I heard a snippet of a - perhaps the - program on FDR that you're talking about. It didn't seem to me to be a fawning description; it pointed out that FDR couldn't have gotten elected to a third term without the issue of WWII and FDR's promise to keep us out of it.The book The New Dealers' War suggests, tho, that FDR used the "magic" crypo intelligence (predicting the Japanese would break off diplomatic negotiations on Dec 7 1941) as an occasion to leak a War Department plan for waging war on Germany and Japan. Which precipitated antiwar demonstations on December 7 - right when the Japanese were bombing Pearl Harbor.
I was also fascinated to learn that in point of fact Herbert Hoover set records for public works expenditures during his term, and that FDR couldn't have done more in 1929-1933 than Hoover himself did in that regard. The bottom line is that although FDR heaped scorn of Hoover for the Depression, FDR had no consistent economic program, and just floundered around and raised taxes. So it should really be thought of as the Hoover-Roosevelt Depression.
Certainly FDR's economic performance doesn't put you in mind of Reagan's turnaround of the Carter stagflation.
Uncle Joe, indeed.
Between Franklin's pandering to Russia in agreeing to handing Eastern Europe over to Stalin and Truman's failure to admit Washington insiders were doing much to undermine what passed for "foreign policy" these two were lousy!
We can thank them for the WWII aftermath, Korea and Vietnam.
I've found the premise of the marketing for the show interesting. "FDR lied to us, but that was OK because he was doing what was best for us."
He killed both pilots, thus the idiot couldn't take off.
He killed himself about an officer fired a 357 Mag through the portal window in the door that hit the high-jacker.
His intention in 1974 was to fly the jet into the Whitehouse!
I did not know about this, did you?
There's an interesting lecture you can get online for free from www.fee.org which goes through each of the stupid things Hoover and Roosevelt did. Roosevelt really didn't know anything about economics. He really didn't seem to have a guiding economic policy vision either. He seemed to want to just get votes. At one time, he was presented with 2 drafts for a speech. One advocated cutting taxes. The other advocated raising taxes. Roosevelt told his speechwriters to mix the two speeches into 1.
It wasn't until Nixon's energy crisis that technology got the green light to move us ahead. The class is very rough on Nixon's attempted government mandated price controls and also blames all of Johnson's social spending which has broken our backs on Kennedy and the legislature. The notion is that Johnson could have gotten anything passed whatsoever as the congress was in a state of collective guilt over the assasination and would pass anything from the executive branch for quite some time if they thought it would make the public more secure in their limited skulls.
The hijacker was actually shot by a civilian who had the presence of mind, and the courage, to take the revolver from the dead rent-a-cop at the gate, and go after the crazed hijacker.
My father reputedly gave a whoop and did a happy dance when the PA over the shop floor (aircraft engine factory in Cincinnati) announced FDR's passing. If a family can be politically incorrect at a genetic level then it's mine.
I saw parts of the show and thought it was pretty even handed. They made no apologies for Roosevelt failing to act when it came to civil rights and an end to racism in the south. It was Eleanor who pushed for reform but Franklin knew it would cost the Dems the southern vote so he would not even support a federal anti lynching bill. This is shameful. I suspect if someone like Warren Harding or Calvin Coolidge were president at that time, they would have supported this legislation.
A black historian on the show said FDR was not a great president because he took no strong action on this issue. He said a great president is one who takes bold, decisive action even at the risk of losing political capital. Sounds to me like a decription of GWB.
The narrator devoted about ten words to that possibility --then dismissed it for having no "compelling" evidence.
Much attention was paid, however, to FDR's frustration over not being able to enter the war due to isolationism and anti-war sentiment...prior to Dec. 7, 1941.
I also noticed Alger Hiss, smiling broadly just behind FDR in the footage shot at the meeting with Stalin and Churchill in Teheran.
The narrator didn't note Hiss's presence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.