If so, they missed this one which is the fourth one listed. Unless of course, you and Google find it flattering. Eye of the beholder and all that.
Posted on 04/18/2005 2:09:48 PM PDT by Bon mots
I often use Google's image search to find photos for various reasons. Lately, I have also taken to using AllTheWeb's image search function.
I have noticed something rather unusual. It used to be quite easy to find unflattering images of Hillary Clinton on Google's image search, but lately, they seem to have all disappeared! Funny, there are still plenty of them on www.alltheweb.com.
This is rather curious, especially since it is widely known that the people who run Google tend to lean left.
Now, on the other hand, if you want to find a nasty photo of Ann Coulter, you will find them in equal numbers on both the unbiased AllTheWeb.com or Google.
It has also become difficult to find current photos of the rapidly aging Hillary on the web. The MSM has obligingly been using older (read younger Hillary) photos of late. Hmmmm....
A couple of years ago, Google was just loaded with funny, sick and offensive Hillary photos - most of which were far from flattering. Where have they all gone? Can we trust Google?
what's next. You will discover that you can search on google and find your phone number?
It is a search engine. Put up a website with Hillary photos and I guarantee you will find your own website via Google.
I doubt it, it would probably be too much work for a particular subject, the images are taken from the first sites returned when searching for Hellary which are probably pay per impression sites that are either pro_Billary or hillary-neutral.
Your question is illogical..There is NO such thing as a flattering pic of Hillary...
Yep! Same thing exists with yahoo image search. George Bush as all sorts of bad pictures the libs get some, but are frequently removed rather quickly.
I never knew there were any flattering images of Hillary...
If you turn off the "Moderate Safe Search" feature on Google -- W00T!
I can't find the "abortions tickle" hillary pic with google.
Try turning "SafeSearch" off & see if your results are different:
http://images.google.com/images?q=hillary+clinton&hl=en&lr=&c2coff=1&safe=off&start=0&sa=N
If so, they missed this one which is the fourth one listed. Unless of course, you and Google find it flattering. Eye of the beholder and all that.
He does have a point. There are fewer demeaning photos of her out there now. Sure, they still exist, but fewer via google.
Is how Hilary looks really that important? I disagree with her vehemently, but I don't understand the personal attacks. Only a supermodel can be in public office if she's a woman?
Sorry, Mike. My post was meant for BonMots.
The only logical thing said on the whole thread
I don't want to make an unpopular statement that's gonna get me flamed around here, but Hillary is just a very pretty, sexy woman and I don't think there are any unflattering pictures of her. Many nights I dream of being Bill Clinton and ravishing Hillary.
(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,
After all. . . why inflict un-necessary pain and suffering on the general public?
Of course, I suppose they could offer a warning about "offensive and objectionable content not suitable for viewing" or some such message.....
Your question infers that there are in fact flattering pictures of Madam H ...
I kindly dissent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
