To: hinterlander
If they kill the Bolton nomintation, then my suggestion is that we just leave the post vacant.
2 posted on
04/18/2005 12:45:18 PM PDT by
Brilliant
To: Brilliant
That is exactly what I was thinking. Just send the UN a note saying we vote no on everything.
10 posted on
04/18/2005 12:49:26 PM PDT by
OK
To: Brilliant
If they kill the Bolton nomination, then my suggestion is that we just leave the post vacant. Exactly. The UN is constantly in opposition to US interests, what better way to get them to come around than to ignore them. If there is any downside whatsoever to not having an ambassador, we can blame it on the Democrats in general, and this committee in particular.
This may even help us with judges, as Dem obstructionism will be exposed as having detrimental consequences.
To: Brilliant
just leave the post vacant.That would roast the RATs' nuts, wouldn't it? Our chair permanently vacant at the UN. I like it!
23 posted on
04/18/2005 12:56:13 PM PDT by
clintonh8r
(Heteronormative and PROUD!!)
To: Brilliant
That might make a valid, albeit back-door, justification for withholding "dues" (extortion). Taxation without representation and all that good stuff...
33 posted on
04/18/2005 1:04:49 PM PDT by
chimera
To: Brilliant
Yep. Just tell the Rhinos, "No Bolton, No other nominee." Seat remains vacant.
37 posted on
04/18/2005 1:05:26 PM PDT by
Tallguy
To: Brilliant
38 posted on
04/18/2005 1:06:17 PM PDT by
demlosers
(Rumsfeld: "We don't have an exit strategy, we have a victory strategy.'')
To: Brilliant
If they kill the Bolton nomintation, then my suggestion is that we just leave the post vacant. Yes, just leave whatever careerist "acting secretary" we have there now. The UN is not important enough to rate an ambassador.
SO9
To: Brilliant
[ If they kill the Bolton nomintation, then my suggestion is that we just leave the post vacant. ]
THATS BILLIANT!...
The old, Talk to the HAND if you can find it move..
Indifference is the most sincere form of a "dis"...
Bush to withdraw the Bolten nomination and don't make a new one.. -or- we're studing the problem... LoL..
Check and Mate.. What would be lost?.. NOTHING...
49 posted on
04/18/2005 1:10:23 PM PDT by
hosepipe
(This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
To: Brilliant
54 posted on
04/18/2005 1:15:24 PM PDT by
paguch
To: Brilliant
If they kill the Bolton nomintation, then my suggestion is that we just leave the post vacant.That or nominate Robert Bork.
75 posted on
04/18/2005 1:48:42 PM PDT by
Stultis
To: Brilliant
That was brilliant, Brilliant!
I would add, that the U.S. check for it's "share" of U.N. expenses be sown into the shirt pocket of Mr. Bolton....
No Bolten, no U.S. Ambassador and no U.S. money to the U.N..
Semper Fi
84 posted on
04/18/2005 2:05:17 PM PDT by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: Brilliant
Brilliant - that is brilliant
111 posted on
04/18/2005 2:55:43 PM PDT by
rhombus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson