Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: what's up
You miss the point entirely. 55 years ago people were being persecuted for statements and/or decisions they had made 75 years ago. They were put in the spotlight by grand-standing congressmen and told "defend your words or suffer". Defend words? What happened to freedom of speech?

A lot of folks on this forum are ok with this because of the targeted group, but what if it were Evangelical, anti-Abortion Christians who were on the spot? Whom would you respect more; people who got on their knees and said, "yeah, I was there but it was that guy who did all the talking" to save their jobs at the post office or the people who might say, "none of the government's effin business what church I went to thirty years ago"?

206 posted on 04/19/2005 1:16:25 PM PDT by wtc911 ("I would like at least to know his name.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]


To: wtc911
The difference is between facing an anti-Christ tribunal and a anti-Communist tribunal. One is evil and one is...well, put it this way. The panel made mistakes, but being anti-Communist is a good thing and not the same as being anti-christian.

If the guy had realized the bigger picture...that the panel was fighting a fight against Communism, maybe he should have cooperated. Turns out that Communists did get into the Government later. So the committee's fears were not that far off.

Ronald Reagan cooperated. De Silva should have too. Keeping quiet made him look like someone the studios didn't want to work with.

209 posted on 04/19/2005 1:30:46 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson