Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

COULTER RIPS MAG PHOTO 'DISTORTION'
The Drudge Report ^ | April 18, 2005 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 04/18/2005 9:09:12 AM PDT by MisterRepublican

"Why can't they just photograph conservatives straight?!" blasted this week's TIME magazine covergirl Ann Coulter.

The bestselling author and controversialist slammed magazine editors for fronting a photo of her, she claims, which is so distorted "my own mother would not even recognize me!"

The photographer, Platon, appears to have used a wide "Fisheye" lense for the cover snap, stretching Coulter's legs and feet -- while shrinking the rest of her body.

(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; coulter; liberalelites; mediabias; timemag; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 next last
To: MisterRepublican

Yeah, she looks like a cross between OPzzy Osbourne and Maralyn Manson.


141 posted on 04/18/2005 11:59:14 AM PDT by NormB (Yes, but watch your cookies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

I think the photographer was just trying to take an interesting pic. I think it's good.

Seems to me that libs could have more to complain about the one he did of Clinton...


142 posted on 04/18/2005 11:59:28 AM PDT by Jim_Curtis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Modernman

Well to me she tells the truth. All she does is repeat what liberals do and say about themselves, and the only thing maybe radical about her is her method of telling the truth. Like she calls the democrats the "traitor party". Of course not all of them are traitors, but 90% of them in my mind sure the hell are and that qualifies it to me as a "traitor party". Why? Because they constantly side with the enemies of the United States. She is just stating that fact as blunt as possible.


143 posted on 04/18/2005 12:01:31 PM PDT by Imaverygooddriver (ALL YOU BASE ARE BELONG TO US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican
How Time really wanted Anne to look:
144 posted on 04/18/2005 12:01:57 PM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA

Ann is no big deal. She looks at least 5'11 and weighs 110 lbs. I'd like to see her in a bikini. The hair, the gun the conserative wit turns guys on I guess. Guys are turned on with "image", more than women. I am not too impressed with her. She is difficult to listen to.


145 posted on 04/18/2005 12:19:30 PM PDT by Old anti feminist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

Her nose has been redone


146 posted on 04/18/2005 12:36:18 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

The deathly cold light was used on purpose. Cadaverish.


147 posted on 04/18/2005 12:37:18 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor
I was thinking the same thing. Any publicity is good publicity.
148 posted on 04/18/2005 12:41:02 PM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

I agree with Ann. Why does TIME have to intentionally distort the photo by using a fisheye lens.


149 posted on 04/18/2005 12:43:06 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

That's the first thing I thought of when I saw Ann's photo.


150 posted on 04/18/2005 12:49:22 PM PDT by ImpotentRage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2

I am trying to understand all of this but my mind simply rejects the concept of a bad Anne Coulter picture. I really don't understand what everyone is talking about. I don't see it. I see the time picture, my eyes see it, it goes into my brain and my brain says "YUM!" What am I missing, can anyone help me.


151 posted on 04/18/2005 12:59:17 PM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: The Toll

It really not as bad a picture as Ann says it is.


152 posted on 04/18/2005 1:02:03 PM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom

Does that explain the Red Witch hat formed by the one tip of the "m"?


Time has used the "M" to make devil horns on Bush...


153 posted on 04/18/2005 1:02:38 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

looks like someone deliberately tried to take a bad pic of a gorgeous lady. only makes time look shady......


154 posted on 04/18/2005 1:05:52 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tioga
I agree with you tioga.


155 posted on 04/18/2005 1:11:58 PM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

Time is, simply, evil.


156 posted on 04/18/2005 1:16:38 PM PDT by Lazamataz (They taunted and gloated with perverse kitty pictures....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican
Has anyone else noticed, or is it just me...
That the notoriously left-wing Google Image Search appears to be censoring most unflattering images of Hillary Clinton, but not those of Ann Coulter? Try a little search of your own and see.

Enter the name "Hillary Clinton" into the image search engines of both and look at the difference between the heavily biased Google search, and the unbiased Alltheweb. It appears that Google has scrubbed most unflattering images of Hillaroo.

Google Image Search

All The Web Image Search

157 posted on 04/18/2005 1:55:14 PM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BullDog108

If that's a real picture of her years ago she's had more plastic surgery than Michael Jackson.


158 posted on 04/18/2005 2:13:24 PM PDT by Voteamerica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

Google is infested with leftist scum.


159 posted on 04/18/2005 2:28:42 PM PDT by BullDog108 ("Conservatives believe in God. Liberals think they are God." ---Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Sicon
I just always imagine an irate woman letting fly on her boyfriend/husband/obnoxious-would be-suitor/assailant with one of those things - especially the ones with actual metal tips - and ripping a guy's spleen wide open! Not that I have the slightest idea where the spleen is actually located, or what on earth it does.

It's under the left side of your diaphram and here's some good info on what your spleen is for.

Essentially that would be a nasty thing for a gal to do and would leave you open to blood infections long-term.

160 posted on 04/18/2005 3:45:22 PM PDT by IonImplantGuru (Give me heaven... or a 637!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson